Literature DB >> 10097469

Strategies to improve electrode positioning and safety in cochlear implants.

S J Rebscher1, M Heilmann, W Bruszewski, N H Talbot, R L Snyder, M M Merzenich.   

Abstract

An injection-molded internal supporting rib has been produced to control the flexibility of silicone rubber encapsulated electrodes designed to electrically stimulate the auditory nerve in human subjects with severe to profound hearing loss. The rib molding dies, and molds for silicone rubber encapsulation of the electrode, were designed and machined using AutoCad and MasterCam software packages in a PC environment. After molding, the prototype plastic ribs were iteratively modified based on observations of the performance of the rib/silicone composite insert in a clear plastic model of the human scala tympani cavity. The rib-based electrodes were reliably inserted farther into these models, required less insertion force and were positioned closer to the target auditory neural elements than currently available cochlear implant electrodes. With further design improvements the injection-molded rib may also function to accurately support metal stimulating contacts and wire leads during assembly to significantly increase the manufacturing efficiency of these devices. This method to reliably control the mechanical properties of miniature implantable devices with multiple electrical leads may be valuable in other areas of biomedical device design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10097469     DOI: 10.1109/10.748987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  7 in total

1.  Determination of the curling behavior of a preformed cochlear implant electrode array.

Authors:  Thomas S Rau; Omid Majdani; Andreas Hussong; Thomas Lenarz; Martin Leinung
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Considerations for design of future cochlear implant electrode arrays: electrode array stiffness, size, and depth of insertion.

Authors:  Stephen J Rebscher; Alexander Hetherington; Ben Bonham; Peter Wardrop; David Whinney; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

3.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 4.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05

5.  A manually operated, advance off-stylet insertion tool for minimally invasive cochlear implantation surgery.

Authors:  Louis B Kratchman; Daniel Schurzig; Theodore R McRackan; Ramya Balachandran; Jack H Noble; Robert J Webster; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Biomaterials in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Timo Stöver; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

7.  Modiolus-hugging intracochlear electrode array with shape memory alloy.

Authors:  Kyou Sik Min; Sang Beom Jun; Yoon Seob Lim; Se-Ik Park; Sung June Kim
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.238

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.