Literature DB >> 10090191

Methodological issues in radiographic scoring methods in rheumatoid arthritis.

D van der Heijde1, M Boers, M Lassere.   

Abstract

Radiographs are important endpoints in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Several scoring methods exist. However, many methodological issues are unsolved and require more attention. The following issues will be addressed: the abnormalities that should be scored; joints that should be included in a scoring method; whether both right and left hands and feet should be scored; views that should be used; the order in which radiographs should be scored; how data should be evaluated; how intra/interobserver variation and sensitivity to change should be assessed; the optimum number of readers to assess radiographs; the score to be used if there are multiple readers; quality assurance, international training, a validation set of radiographs, and automated scoring of radiographs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10090191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  18 in total

Review 1.  Interpreting radiographic data in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  P A Ory
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  An overview of commonly used radiographic scoring methods in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials.

Authors:  Vinod Ravindran; Satish Rachapalli
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Reporting of radiographic methods in randomised controlled trials assessing structural outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Gabriel Baron; Isabelle Boutron; Bruno Giraudeau; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  The Infliximab Multinational Psoriatic Arthritis Controlled Trial (IMPACT): results of radiographic analyses after 1 year.

Authors:  A Kavanaugh; C E Antoni; D Gladman; S Wassenberg; B Zhou; A Beutler; G Keenan; G Burmester; D E Furst; M H Weisman; J R Kalden; J Smolen; D van der Heijde
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  Treatment trials in ankylosing spondylitis: current and future considerations.

Authors:  D van der Heijde; J Braun; D McGonagle; J Siegel
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 6.  Radiographic scoring methods as outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis: properties and advantages.

Authors:  S Boini; F Guillemin
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 7.  Prevention or retardation of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis: issues of definition, evaluation and interpretation of plain radiographs.

Authors:  Maarten Boers; Désirée M F M van der Heijde
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Course of radiographic damage over 10 years in a cohort with early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  E Lindqvist; K Jonsson; T Saxne; K Eberhardt
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  Pursuit of optimal outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  David L Scott
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  The prognostic value of baseline erosions in undifferentiated arthritis.

Authors:  Mohamed M Thabet; Thomas W J Huizinga; Désirée M van der Heijde; Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.