Literature DB >> 12381508

Treatment trials in ankylosing spondylitis: current and future considerations.

D van der Heijde1, J Braun, D McGonagle, J Siegel.   

Abstract

Emerging treatment options in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are giving new hope to patients with this chronic and potentially disabling disease. Clinical development of new treatments requires that rigorous and well controlled trials be conducted to demonstrate safety and efficacy. A number of classification systems have been developed in recent years as a result of enhanced understanding of the pathogenesis of AS. Although new outcome measures have been developed and a consensus has been reached on the use of assessment instruments in clinical trials, there is still need for improvement and implementation. The ASsessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) Working Group has addressed some of these dilemmas by establishing a core set of domains for the evaluation of AS and by selecting specific assessment methods for each domain. They have also published improvement criteria for assessing short term improvement with symptom modifying antirheumatic drugs and are presently in the process of developing response criteria for disease controlling antirheumatic treatment. Various experts are also currently examining discrepancies and inadequacies of classification systems for AS. Imaging studies, magnetic resonance imaging, in particular, may provide better classification criteria in the near future. In addition to consensus on outcome assessment and classification of AS, lessons learnt from clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may serve as a template for AS. Guidance provided by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for clinical trials in RA may be of particular use. The FDA has defined the claims that sponsors can receive for RA products and the clinical trial data that would be expected to be submitted to support such claims.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12381508      PMCID: PMC1766730          DOI: 10.1136/ard.61.suppl_3.iii24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  42 in total

Review 1.  Plain radiographs as an outcome measure in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  D van der Heijde; A Spoorenberg
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  Radiological scoring methods in ankylosing spondylitis: reliability and sensitivity to change over one year.

Authors:  A Spoorenberg; K de Vlam; D van der Heijde; E de Klerk; M Dougados; H Mielants; H van der Tempel; M Boers; S van der Linden
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  A new dimension to outcome: application of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index.

Authors:  A Calin; K Mackay; H Santos; S Brophy
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  The role of biomechanical factors and HLA-B27 in magnetic resonance imaging-determined bone changes in plantar fascia enthesopathy.

Authors:  Dennis McGonagle; Helena Marzo-Ortega; Philip O'Connor; Wayne Gibbon; Colin Pease; Richard Reece; Paul Emery
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-02

5.  Clinical and imaging correlates of response to treatment with infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  M Stone; D Salonen; M Lax; U Payne; V Lapp; R Inman
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  Efficacy of etanercept in the treatment of the entheseal pathology in resistant spondylarthropathy: a clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  H Marzo-Ortega; D McGonagle; P O'Connor; P Emery
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-09

7.  Quantitative analyses of sacroiliac biopsies in spondyloarthropathies: T cells and macrophages predominate in early and active sacroiliitis- cellularity correlates with the degree of enhancement detected by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Bollow; T Fischer; H Reisshauer; M Backhaus; J Sieper; B Hamm; J Braun
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Ankylosing spondylitis assessment group preliminary definition of short-term improvement in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  J J Anderson; G Baron; D van der Heijde; D T Felson; M Dougados
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-08

9.  Efficacy of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase 2-specific inhibitor, in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a six-week controlled study with comparison against placebo and against a conventional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug.

Authors:  M Dougados; J M Béhier; I Jolchine; A Calin; D van der Heijde; I Olivieri; H Zeidler; H Herman
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-01

10.  Ankylosing spondylitis: what is the optimum duration of a clinical study? A one year versus a 6 weeks non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug trial.

Authors:  M Dougados; A Gueguen; J P Nakache; P Velicitat; E M Veys; H Zeidler; A Calin
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.580

View more
  4 in total

1.  Nasal Crohn's disease /apheresis.

Authors:  David A Schwartz
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2008-02

2.  Modulation of bone morphogenetic protein signaling inhibits the onset and progression of ankylosing enthesitis.

Authors:  Rik J U Lories; Inge Derese; Frank P Luyten
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Which patients with ankylosing spondylitis should be treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibiting therapy? A survey among Dutch rheumatologists.

Authors:  R Landewé; B Rump; D van der Heijde; S van der Linden
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  A history of the term "DMARD".

Authors:  Jonas Kure Buer
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 4.473

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.