Literature DB >> 10080372

Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by motor imagery: a magnetic stimulation study.

L Fadiga1, G Buccino, L Craighero, L Fogassi, V Gallese, G Pavesi.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to investigate whether the excitability of the corticospinal system is selectively affected by motor imagery. To this purpose, we performed two experiments. In the first one we recorded motor evoked potentials from right hand and arm muscles during mental simulation of flexion/extension movements of both distal and proximal joints. In the second experiment we applied magnetic stimulation to the right and the left motor cortex of subjects while they were imagining opening or closing their right or their left hand. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from a hand muscle contralateral to the stimulated cortex. The results demonstrated that the excitability pattern during motor imagery dynamically mimics that occurring during movement execution. In addition, while magnetic stimulation of the left motor cortex revealed increased corticospinal excitability when subjects imagined ipsilateral as well as contralateral hand movements, the stimulation of the right motor cortex revealed a facilitatory effect induced by imagery of contralateral hand movements only. In conclusion, motor imagery is a high level process, which, however, manifests itself in the activation of those same cortical circuits that are normally involved in movement execution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10080372     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00089-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  106 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying motor neurophysiology of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Fumiko Maeda; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Changes in corticospinal motor excitability induced by non-motor linguistic tasks.

Authors:  I Papathanasiou; S R Filipović; R Whurr; J C Rothwell; M Jahanshahi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition during motor imagery is task-dependent.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  In the absence of physical practice, observation and imagery do not result in updating of internal models for aiming.

Authors:  Nicole T Ong; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Emotional stimuli modulate readiness for action: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Anouk M van Loon; Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Anda H van Stegeren; Greg Hajcak; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Contribution of the primary motor cortex to motor imagery: a subthreshold TMS study.

Authors:  Barbara Pelgrims; Nicolas Michaux; Etienne Olivier; Michael Andres
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Neural representations involved in observed, imagined, and imitated actions are dissociable and hierarchically organized.

Authors:  Kristen L Macuga; Scott H Frey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Observation, imagination and execution of an effortful movement: more evidence for a central explanation of motor imagery.

Authors:  Theo Mulder; Sjoerd de Vries; Sjouke Zijlstra
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Abnormal motor excitability in patients with psychogenic paresis. A TMS study.

Authors:  Joachim Liepert; Thomas Hassa; Oliver Tüscher; Roger Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 10.  Brain repair after stroke--a novel neurological model.

Authors:  Steven L Small; Giovanni Buccino; Ana Solodkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 42.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.