Literature DB >> 15654585

Observation, imagination and execution of an effortful movement: more evidence for a central explanation of motor imagery.

Theo Mulder1, Sjoerd de Vries, Sjouke Zijlstra.   

Abstract

In this study subjects had to imagine, observe and perform a series of 25 squat movements while lifting two dumbbells of 12.5 kg each (one with each hand). This movement is effortful and requires substantial activation of peripheral systems. It was asked whether subjects when they imagined that they were performing the movements or when they observed a model performing the squat movements would show increased activity in EMG, heart rate and respiration compared with a control condition where they sat relaxed in a comfortable chair or a condition where they actually performed the squat movements. Two groups of subjects participated in the experiment: experienced squatters and novices. By employing these two groups we were able to study the differential effect of earlier experience with the target movement on peripheral activation. The results showed that with the exception of respiration no significant peripheral activation could be measured related to motor imagery. Although a clear distinction in experience existed between the experienced squatters versus the novices, no relevant imagery-related differences could be obtained between the two groups. The results are discussed in the light of a central explanation of motor imagery.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15654585     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2179-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  22 in total

1.  Changes in breathing during observation of effortful actions.

Authors:  C Paccalin; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-04-17       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Grèzes; J Decety
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Motor facilitation while observing hand actions: specificity of the effect and role of observer's orientation.

Authors:  Fumiko Maeda; Galit Kleiner-Fisman; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Motor learning produces parallel dynamic functional changes during the execution and imagination of sequential foot movements.

Authors:  Martin F Lafleur; Philip L Jackson; Francine Malouin; Carol L Richards; Alan C Evans; Julien Doyon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Vegetative response during imagined movement is proportional to mental effort.

Authors:  J Decety; M Jeannerod; M Germain; J Pastene
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1991-01-31       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Effect of mental imagery of a motor task on the Hoffmann reflex.

Authors:  B S Hale; J S Raglin; D M Koceja
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-16       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Functional anatomy of the mental representation of upper extremity movements in healthy subjects.

Authors:  K M Stephan; G R Fink; R E Passingham; D Silbersweig; A O Ceballos-Baumann; C D Frith; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition.

Authors:  M Jeannerod
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading.

Authors:  V Gallese; A Goldman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Central activation of autonomic effectors during mental simulation of motor actions in man.

Authors:  J Decety; M Jeannerod; D Durozard; G Baverel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  14 in total

1.  Spinal plasticity with motor imagery practice.

Authors:  Sidney Grosprêtre; Florent Lebon; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Alain Martin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Active vision during action execution, observation and imagery: evidence for shared motor representations.

Authors:  Sheree A McCormick; Joe Causer; Paul S Holmes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Imagining is Not Doing but Involves Specific Motor Commands: A Review of Experimental Data Related to Motor Inhibition.

Authors:  Aymeric Guillot; Franck Di Rienzo; Tadhg Macintyre; Aidan Moran; Christian Collet
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Does observation of postural imbalance induce a postural reaction?

Authors:  Banty Tia; Arnaud Saimpont; Christos Paizis; France Mourey; Luciano Fadiga; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Cognitive and cognitive-motor interventions affecting physical functioning: a systematic review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pichierri; Peter Wolf; Kurt Murer; Eling D de Bruin
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Recovery of motor imagery ability in stroke patients.

Authors:  Sjoerd de Vries; Marga Tepper; Bert Otten; Theo Mulder
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2011-04-05

7.  Motor imagery: lessons learned in movement science might be applicable for spaceflight.

Authors:  Otmar Bock; Nadja Schott; Charalambos Papaxanthis
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-18

8.  Autonomic nervous system correlates in movement observation and motor imagery.

Authors:  C Collet; F Di Rienzo; N El Hoyek; A Guillot
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Th Mulder
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  What can other animals tell us about human social cognition? An evolutionary perspective on reflective and reflexive processing.

Authors:  E E Hecht; R Patterson; A K Barbey
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.