OBJECTIVE: Prior studies of hydroxyapatite orbital implant complications have primarily focused on complications of the implant itself with only occasional mention of the complications associated with the peg system. This in part may be because of a low rate of pegging and, thus, a small sample size to evaluate. Therefore, a full range of complications that can occur with pegging has not been presented. The objective of this study was to determine the complications associated with pegging and to discuss ways to manage them. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS/INTERVENTION: The authors analyzed all of the complications associated with pegging 165 of a possible 275 hydroxyapatite implants implanted by 2 surgeons over 7 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The following data were recorded: type of surgery performed, size of implant used, type of hydroxyapatite used, peg system used, time of pegging, follow-up duration, problems encountered, and treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-two (37.5%) of the 165 patients who had pegged implants were found to have problems with their pegs. Twenty-one (33.8%) of the 62 patients with peg problems had more than 1 peg-related problem. Complications associated with pegging included discharge (37%; 23 of 62), pyogenic granulomas (30.6%; 19 of 62), peg falling out (29%; 18 of 62), poor transfer of movement (11.2%; 7 of 62), clicking (11.2%; 7 of 62), conjunctiva overgrowing peg (4.8%; 3 of 62), poor-fitting sleeve (4.8%; 3 of 62), part of sleeve shaft visible (4.8%; 3 of 62), peg drilled on an angle (4.8%; 3 of 62), hydroxyapatite visible around peg hole (3.2%; 2 of 62), peg drilled off-center (3.2%; 2 of 62), popping peg (3.2%; 2 of 62), and excess movement of peg (3.2%; 2 of 62). The most serious complication occurring in two individuals (3.2%) was implant infection requiring implant removal. CONCLUSION: There are several potential complications that can occur after pegging the hydroxyapatite implant. These problems are generally of a minor nature but often require additional patient visits that would not ordinarily have been required if the peg was not in place. The most serious peg problem is implant infection, which may necessitate implant removal. These potential peg problems should be reviewed with the patient before the procedure is performed.
OBJECTIVE: Prior studies of hydroxyapatite orbital implant complications have primarily focused on complications of the implant itself with only occasional mention of the complications associated with the peg system. This in part may be because of a low rate of pegging and, thus, a small sample size to evaluate. Therefore, a full range of complications that can occur with pegging has not been presented. The objective of this study was to determine the complications associated with pegging and to discuss ways to manage them. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS/INTERVENTION: The authors analyzed all of the complications associated with pegging 165 of a possible 275 hydroxyapatite implants implanted by 2 surgeons over 7 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The following data were recorded: type of surgery performed, size of implant used, type of hydroxyapatite used, peg system used, time of pegging, follow-up duration, problems encountered, and treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-two (37.5%) of the 165 patients who had pegged implants were found to have problems with their pegs. Twenty-one (33.8%) of the 62 patients with peg problems had more than 1 peg-related problem. Complications associated with pegging included discharge (37%; 23 of 62), pyogenic granulomas (30.6%; 19 of 62), peg falling out (29%; 18 of 62), poor transfer of movement (11.2%; 7 of 62), clicking (11.2%; 7 of 62), conjunctiva overgrowing peg (4.8%; 3 of 62), poor-fitting sleeve (4.8%; 3 of 62), part of sleeve shaft visible (4.8%; 3 of 62), peg drilled on an angle (4.8%; 3 of 62), hydroxyapatite visible around peg hole (3.2%; 2 of 62), peg drilled off-center (3.2%; 2 of 62), popping peg (3.2%; 2 of 62), and excess movement of peg (3.2%; 2 of 62). The most serious complication occurring in two individuals (3.2%) was implant infection requiring implant removal. CONCLUSION: There are several potential complications that can occur after pegging the hydroxyapatite implant. These problems are generally of a minor nature but often require additional patient visits that would not ordinarily have been required if the peg was not in place. The most serious peg problem is implant infection, which may necessitate implant removal. These potential peg problems should be reviewed with the patient before the procedure is performed.
Authors: Daphne L Mourits; Dyonne T Hartong; Machteld I Bosscha; Roel J H M Kloos; Annette C Moll Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 3.240