Literature DB >> 10077047

Combined molecular and clinical approaches for the identification of families with familial adenomatous polyposis coli.

J F Gebert1, C Dupon, M Kadmon, M Hahn, C Herfarth, M von Knebel Doeberitz, H K Schackert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Using an interdisciplinary clinical and molecular approach, the authors identified APC germline mutations in families with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Correlation of mutation site with disease manifestation and the impact of molecular data on clinical proceedings were examined. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Germline mutations in the APC gene predispose to FAP. Established and proposed genotype-phenotype correlations as well as the influence of mutation site on surgical procedures have been reported. The predictive value of APC mutation analysis for disease manifestation and therapeutic decision making needs to be investigated further.
METHODS: One hundred twenty-three kindreds of the local FAP registry were included in this study. CHRPE phenotype was defined as at least one large characteristic lesion or a total of four lesions in both eyes. APC mutations were identified by protein truncation test and automated DNA sequencing from patient lymphocyte DNA and RNA.
RESULTS: APC germline mutations were identified in 85/123 families with FAP. They were located between codons 213 and 1581 of the APC gene and displayed distinct genotype-phenotype correlations. CHRPE status facilitated mutation analysis by discriminating regions of interest within the APC coding region. Severe manifestations of desmoids were restricted to mutations between codons 1444 through 1581. Whereas 91% (75/82) of at-risk persons were excluded as mutation carriers, APC germline mutations were detected before clinical examination in 9% (7/82) of at-risk persons. One patient agreed to endoscopy only after mutation detection.
CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the feasibility of combined molecular and clinical screening of families with FAP and may provide a guideline for routine presymptomatic molecular diagnostics in a clinical laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10077047      PMCID: PMC1191700          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199903000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  56 in total

1.  Direct solid phase sequencing of genomic and plasmid DNA using magnetic beads as solid support.

Authors:  T Hultman; S Ståhl; E Hornes; M Uhlén
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-07-11       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Germline mutations in the 3' part of APC exon 15 do not result in truncated proteins and are associated with attenuated adenomatous polyposis coli.

Authors:  R B van der Luijt; P Meera Khan; H F Vasen; C Breukel; C M Tops; R J Scott; R Fodde
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Identifying the right stop: determining how the surveillance complex recognizes and degrades an aberrant mRNA.

Authors:  M J Ruiz-Echevarría; C I González; S W Peltz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  p53 and APC gene mutations: software and databases.

Authors:  C Béroud; T Soussi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  A Romania; Z N Zakov; E McGannon; T Schroeder; F Heyen; D G Jagelman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Apc gene mutation is associated with a dominant-negative effect upon intestinal cell migration.

Authors:  N N Mahmoud; S K Boolbol; R T Bilinski; C Martucci; A Chadburn; M M Bertagnolli
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  APC genotype, polyp number, and surgical options in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  J S Wu; P Paul; E A McGannon; J M Church
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Secretory phospholipase A2 does not appear to be associated with phenotypic variation in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Z Dobbie; H Müller; R J Scott
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Molecular genetic tests as a guide to surgical management of familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  H F Vasen; R B van der Luijt; J F Slors; E Buskens; P de Ruiter; C G Baeten; W R Schouten; H J Oostvogel; J H Kuijpers; C M Tops; P Meera Khan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-08-17       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Molecular analysis of the APC gene in 105 Dutch kindreds with familial adenomatous polyposis: 67 germline mutations identified by DGGE, PTT, and southern analysis.

Authors:  R B van der Luijt; P M Khan; H F Vasen; C M Tops; I S van Leeuwen-Cornelisse; J T Wijnen; H M van der Klift; R J Plug; G Griffioen; R Fodde
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.878

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  [Preventive surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis coli].

Authors:  M Kadmon
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Can APC mutation analysis contribute to therapeutic decisions in familial adenomatous polyposis? Experience from 680 FAP families.

Authors:  W Friedl; R Caspari; M Sengteller; S Uhlhaas; C Lamberti; M Jungck; M Kadmon; M Wolf; J Fahnenstich; J Gebert; G Möslein; E Mangold; P Propping
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Familial adenomatous polyposis: The practical applications of clinical and molecular screening.

Authors:  Paul Rozen; Finlay Macrae
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Estrogen Receptor β as a Prognostic Marker of Tumor Progression in Colorectal Cancer with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis and Sporadic Polyps.

Authors:  Paulo Roberto Stevanato Filho; Samuel Aguiar Júnior; Maria Dirlei Begnami; Fábio de Oliveira Ferreira; Wilson Toshihiko Nakagawa; Ranyell Matheus Sobreira Batista Spencer; Tiago Santoro Bezerra; Philip Edward Boggiss; Ademar Lopes
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  Aetiology of colorectal cancer and relevance of monogenic inheritance.

Authors:  M Ponz de Leon; P Benatti; F Borghi; M Pedroni; A Scarselli; C Di Gregorio; L Losi; A Viel; M Genuardi; G Abbati; G Rossi; M Menigatti; I Lamberti; G Ponti; L Roncucci
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Familial adenomatous polyposis: experience from a study of 1164 unrelated german polyposis patients.

Authors:  Waltraut Friedl; Stefan Aretz
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 2.857

Review 7.  Genotype to phenotype: analyzing the effects of inherited mutations in colorectal cancer families.

Authors:  Christopher D Heinen
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 8.  [Hereditary colorectal cancer].

Authors:  G Möslein
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 9.  Preventive surgery for colon cancer in familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome.

Authors:  Gabriela Möslein; Steffen Pistorius; Hans-Detlev Saeger; Hans K Schackert
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 10.  Current status of familial gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes.

Authors:  Ioan Jung; Simona Gurzu; Gligore Sabin Turdean
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.