Literature DB >> 9445111

APC genotype, polyp number, and surgical options in familial adenomatous polyposis.

J S Wu1, P Paul, E A McGannon, J M Church.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to examine the relation between phenotypic expression in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and the site of mutations in the APC (adenomatous polyposis coli) gene. The ability of APC mutations to predict surgical outcome was also investigated. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Germline mutations in the APC gene cause FAP and can now be identified by direct mutational analysis. Such an analysis can identify affected persons for close surveillance and spare unaffected persons. Phenotypic expression varies within and among FAP kindreds, but certain mutations have been associated with severe disease. Patients with severe polyposis are frequently offered total proctocolectomy rather than colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis out of concern for increased rectal cancer risk. Mutation analysis may offer a more rational basis for these decisions.
METHODS: The postsurgical courses of 58 patients from 19 FAP kindreds with identified APC gene mutations were reviewed. APC gene mutations were identified by analysis of leukocyte DNA using single-strand conformational analysis and DNA sequencing. FAP severity was defined according to the number of polyps in the colon at the time of resection (< 1000, mild; > 1000, severe). Operations included subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA), total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch/anal anastomosis, total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy, and partial colectomy (PC).
RESULTS: Eight different APC mutations were identified. Mutations at codons 1309 and 1328 in exon 15G were associated with a uniformly severe polyposis phenotype. For other mutations, the phenotype was more variable. Patients with APC mutations at codons 1309 and 1328 more commonly underwent proctectomy. Among the 43 patients who initially underwent either IRA or PC, the rectum was later removed in 8. Seven of these patients had a mutation at codon 1309 or 1328. With one exception, all patients with mutations outside the 1309 or 1328 site who initially had IRA have retained their rectum.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data support an association between severe polyposis phenotype and mutations at APC gene codons 1309 and 1328. For patients with these mutations, the prognosis for retaining the rectum is poor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9445111      PMCID: PMC1191173          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199801000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  18 in total

1.  Rectal cancer risk in older patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and an ileorectal anastomosis: a cause for concern.

Authors:  K P Nugent; R K Phillips
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Detection of polymorphisms of human DNA by gel electrophoresis as single-strand conformation polymorphisms.

Authors:  M Orita; H Iwahana; H Kanazawa; K Hayashi; T Sekiya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Management of multiple polyposis of the large bowel.

Authors:  C G Moertel; J R Hill; M A Adson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis: the risk of rectal cancer.

Authors:  R G Sarre; D G Jagelman; G J Beck; E McGannon; V W Fazio; F L Weakley; I C Lavery
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Rectal cancer risk in patients treated for familial adenomatous polyposis. The Leeds Castle Polyposis Group.

Authors:  J J De Cosse; S Bülow; K Neale; H Järvinen; T Alm; R Hultcrantz; F Moesgaard; C Costello
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Identical APC exon 15 mutations result in a variable phenotype in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  P Paul; T Letteboer; L Gelbert; J Groden; R White; M J Coppes
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Identification and characterization of the familial adenomatous polyposis coli gene.

Authors:  J Groden; A Thliveris; W Samowitz; M Carlson; L Gelbert; H Albertsen; G Joslyn; J Stevens; L Spirio; M Robertson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-08-09       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Identification of FAP locus genes from chromosome 5q21.

Authors:  K W Kinzler; M C Nilbert; L K Su; B Vogelstein; T M Bryan; D B Levy; K J Smith; A C Preisinger; P Hedge; D McKechnie
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Alleles of the APC gene: an attenuated form of familial polyposis.

Authors:  L Spirio; S Olschwang; J Groden; M Robertson; W Samowitz; G Joslyn; L Gelbert; A Thliveris; M Carlson; B Otterud
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-12-03       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Correlation between the location of germ-line mutations in the APC gene and the number of colorectal polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis patients.

Authors:  H Nagase; Y Miyoshi; A Horii; T Aoki; M Ogawa; J Utsunomiya; S Baba; T Sasazuki; Y Nakamura
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  32 in total

1.  Explaining differences in the severity of familial adenomatous polyposis and the search for modifier genes.

Authors:  R Houlston; M Crabtree; R Phillips; M Crabtree; I Tomlinson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic total colorectal resection for familial adenomatous polyposis with coexisting rectal cancer.

Authors:  Y Watanabe; M Sato; H Kikkawa; M Yoshida; H Kusunose; K Kawachi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  K-ras mutation and loss of heterozygosity at 17p with beta-catenin accumulation in intramucosal carcinoma of the ileostomy in familial adenomatous polyposis: a case report.

Authors:  Keisuke Hata; Toshiaki Watanabe; Yutaka J Kawamura; Hironori Ishigami; Takamitsu Kanazawa; Tomohiro Tada; Bin Zhao; Shinichiro Koketsu; Hirokazu Nagawa
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Molecular mechanism of adenomatous polyposis coli-induced blockade of base excision repair pathway in colorectal carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Satya Narayan; Ritika Sharma
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 5.  In which patients do I perform IRA, and why?

Authors:  James Church
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 6.  [Preventive surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis coli].

Authors:  M Kadmon
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Impact of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis on female fertility: meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Siraj G Rajaratnam; Timothy W Eglinton; Phil Hider; Nicola S Fearnhead
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Subsequent Adenomas of Ileal Pouch and Anorectal Segment after Prophylactic Surgery for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.

Authors:  A E M'Koma; A J Herline; S E Adunyah
Journal:  World J Colorectal Surg       Date:  2013

9.  Explaining variation in familial adenomatous polyposis: relationship between genotype and phenotype and evidence for modifier genes.

Authors:  M D Crabtree; I P M Tomlinson; S V Hodgson; K Neale; R K S Phillips; R S Houlston
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Extracolonic manifestations of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes.

Authors:  Daniel A Anaya; George J Chang; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.