Literature DB >> 10069463

The major, N2-dG adduct of (+)-anti-B[a]PDE induces G-->A mutations in a 5'-AGA-3' sequence context.

R Shukla1, N E Geacintov, E L Loechler.   

Abstract

Previously, in a random mutagenesis study, the (+)-anti diol epoxide of benzo[a]pyrene [(+)-anti-B[a]PDE] was shown to induce a complex mutational spectrum in the supF gene of an Escherichia coli plasmid, which included insertions, deletions and base substitution mutations, notably a significant fraction of GC-->TA, GC-->AT and GC-->CG mutations. At some sites, a single type of mutation dominated and to understand individual mutagenic pathways these sites were chosen for study by site-specific means to determine whether the major adduct, [+ta]-B[a]P-N2-dG, was responsible. [+ta]-B[a]P-N2-dG was shown to induce approximately 95% G-->T mutations in a 5'-TGC-3' sequence context and approximately 80% G-->A mutations in a 5'-CGT-3' sequence context. (+)-anti-B[a]PDE induced principally GC-->CG mutations in the G133 sequence context (5'-AGA-3') in studies using both SOS-uninduced or SOS-induced E. coli. Herein, [+ta]-B[a]P-N2-dG is shown to induce principally G-->A mutations (>90%) either without or with SOS induction in a closely related 5'-AGA-3' sequence context (identical over 7 bp). This is the first time that there has been a discrepancy between the mutagenic specificity of (+)-anti-B[a]PDE versus [+ta]-B[a]P-N2-dG. Eight explanations for this discordance are considered. Four are ruled out; e.g. the second most prevalent adduct [+ca]-B[a]P-N2-dG also induces a preponderance of G-->A mutations (>90%), so it also is not responsible for (+)-anti-B[a]PDE-induced G133-->C mutations. The four explanations not ruled out are discussed and include that another minor adduct might be responsible and that the 5'-AGA-3' sequence context differed slightly in the studies with [+ta]-B[a]P-N2-dG versus (+)-anti-B[a]PDE. In spite of the discordance, [+ta]-B[a]P-N2-dG induces G-->A mutations in the context studied herein and this result has proven useful in generating a hypothesis for what conformations of [+ta]-B[a]P-N2-dG are responsible for G-->T versus G-->A mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10069463     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/20.2.261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  5 in total

Review 1.  Biological properties of single chemical-DNA adducts: a twenty year perspective.

Authors:  James C Delaney; John M Essigmann
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 2.  DNA adducts: Formation, biological effects, and new biospecimens for mass spectrometric measurements in humans.

Authors:  Byeong Hwa Yun; Jingshu Guo; Medjda Bellamri; Robert J Turesky
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 10.946

3.  Noncovalent interactions of a benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide with DNA base pairs: insight into the formation of adducts of (+)-BaP DE-2 with DNA.

Authors:  Jacqueline C Hargis; Henry F Schaefer; K N Houk; Steven E Wheeler
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 2.781

4.  A structural gap in Dpo4 supports mutagenic bypass of a major benzo[a]pyrene dG adduct in DNA through template misalignment.

Authors:  Jacob Bauer; Guangxin Xing; Haruhiko Yagi; Jane M Sayer; Donald M Jerina; Hong Ling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Translesion Synthesis: Insights into the Selection and Switching of DNA Polymerases.

Authors:  Linlin Zhao; M Todd Washington
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.