Literature DB >> 10068182

Transtracheal electrical stimulation of the spinal cord for intraoperative monitoring of the motor pathway.

G I Csécsei1, L Mikó, G Székely, C Molnár, A Balogh, I Furka, I Mikó.   

Abstract

Because of the suppressant effects of anesthetic drugs and muscle relaxants on motor responses elicited by either magnetic or electrical transcranial stimulation, intraoperative monitoring of the motor system, and especially monitoring of lower limb function, presents many difficulties. The upper part of the spinal cord was stimulated in 14 anesthetized and relaxed dogs with a cathode attached to the intratracheal tube and an anode fixed above the upper cervical spinous processes. Action potentials evoked by single and serial stimuli were recorded from the exposed right femoral nerve and quadriceps muscle Averaging was necessary for serial stimulations. Reproducible early and late responses to both single and serial stimulations were recorded during regular anesthesia. The origin of the different responses is discussed. Transtracheal stimulation of the spinal cord is easy to perform and the responses recorded from the peripheral nerve or limb muscle are well reproducible in regular anesthesia. The method seems to be appropriate for intraoperative monitoring of the thoracolumbar spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10068182     DOI: 10.1007/bf01105777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  18 in total

1.  Influence of halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane on motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  J Zentner; T Albrecht; D Heuser
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  "Backfiring" in spinal cord monitoring. High thoracic spinal cord stimulation evokes sciatic response by antidromic sensory pathway conduction, not motor tract conduction.

Authors:  C F Su; S S Haghighi; J J Oro; R W Gaines
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Spinal cord and nerve root monitoring in spine surgery and related procedures.

Authors:  J Herdmann; V Deletis; H L Edmonds; N Morota
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Spinal cord stimulation evoked potentials during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  B Drenger; S D Parker; R W McPherson; R B North; G M Williams; B A Reitz; C Beattie
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Temporal summation--the key to motor evoked potential spinal cord monitoring in humans.

Authors:  B A Taylor; M E Fennelly; A Taylor; J Farrell
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Effects of propofol, etomidate, midazolam, and fentanyl on motor evoked responses to transcranial electrical or magnetic stimulation in humans.

Authors:  C J Kalkman; J C Drummond; A A Ribberink; P M Patel; T Sano; R G Bickford
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Direct spinal stimulation for intraoperative monitoring during scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  L H Phillips; J S Blanco; M D Sussman
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  Intraoperative monitoring of motor function by magnetic motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  W Y Lee; W Y Hou; L H Yang; S M Lin
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Effects of four intravenous anesthetic agents on motor evoked potentials elicited by magnetic transcranial stimulation.

Authors:  M Taniguchi; J Nadstawek; U Langenbach; F Bremer; J Schramm
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Low concentrations of isoflurane abolish motor evoked responses to transcranial electrical stimulation during nitrous oxide/opioid anesthesia in humans.

Authors:  C J Kalkman; J C Drummond; A A Ribberink
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.108

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.