Literature DB >> 1550274

Effects of propofol, etomidate, midazolam, and fentanyl on motor evoked responses to transcranial electrical or magnetic stimulation in humans.

C J Kalkman1, J C Drummond, A A Ribberink, P M Patel, T Sano, R G Bickford.   

Abstract

The effects of propofol, etomidate, midazolam, and fentanyl on motor evoked responses to transcranial stimulation (tc-MERs) were studied in five healthy human volunteers. Each subject, in four separate sessions, received intravenous bolus doses of propofol 2 mg.kg-1, etomidate 0.3 mg.kg-1, midazolam 0.05 mg.kg-1, and fentanyl 3 micrograms.kg-1. Electrical tc-MERs (tce-MERs) were elicited with anodal stimuli of 500-700 V. Magnetic tc-MERs (tcmag-MERs) were elicited using a Cadwell MES-10 magnetic stimulator at maximum output. Compound muscle action potentials were recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle. Duplicate tce-MERs and tcmag-MERs were recorded before and up to 30 min after drug injection. Reproducible baseline tce-MERs (amplitude 4.7 +/- 0.43 (SEM) mV, latency 29.4 +/- 0.35 ms) and tcmag-MERs (amplitude 3.7 +/- 0.43 mV, latency 31.1 +/- 0.39 ms) were obtained in all subjects. Pronounced depression of tce-MER amplitude to 2% of baseline values (P less than 0.01) was observed 2 min after injection of propofol. Thirty minutes after injection of propofol, amplitude depression to 44% of baseline (P less than 0.05) was still present, despite an apparent lack of sedation. Midazolam caused significant (P less than 0.01) amplitude depression, e.g., tcmag-MER to 16% of baseline values 5 min after injection. Significant depression persisted throughout the 30-min study period. Fentanyl did not cause any statistically significant amplitude changes in this small population. Etomidate caused significant but transient depression of tc-MER amplitude. However, there was considerable intersubject variability. Latency did not change significantly after any drug.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1550274     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199204000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  18 in total

1.  Transtracheal electrical stimulation of the spinal cord for intraoperative monitoring of the motor pathway.

Authors:  G I Csécsei; L Mikó; G Székely; C Molnár; A Balogh; I Furka; I Mikó
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Intraoperative neurophysiology in tethered cord surgery: techniques and results.

Authors:  Francesco Sala; Giovanna Squintani; Vincenzo Tramontano; Chiara Arcaro; Franco Faccioli; Carlo Mazza
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Intraoperative neurophysiology of the conus medullaris and cauda equina.

Authors:  Karl F Kothbauer; Vedran Deletis
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during complex spinal deformity cases in pediatric patients: methodology, utility, prognostication, and outcome.

Authors:  James Drake; Reinhard Zeller; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Samuel Strantzas; Laura Holmes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Somatosensory evoked potential loss due to intraoperative pulse lavage during spine surgery: case report and review of signal change management.

Authors:  Arun George; Hironobu Hayashi; John F Bebawy; Antoun Koht
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 6.  A practical guide for anesthetic management during intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring.

Authors:  Masahiko Kawaguchi; Hiroki Iida; Satoshi Tanaka; Naokazu Fukuoka; Hironobu Hayashi; Shunsuke Izumi; Kenji Yoshitani; Manabu Kakinohana
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Intraoperative transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery under intravenous ketamine or etomidate anaesthesia.

Authors:  L H Yang; S M Lin; W Y Lee; C C Liu
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Prolonged loss of leg myogenic motor evoked potentials during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, without postoperative paraplegia.

Authors:  Sadahei Denda; Miki Taneoka; Hiroyuki Honda; Yukiko Watanabe; Hidekazu Imai; Yasushi Kitahara
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Evaluation of the applicability of sevoflurane during post-tetanic myogenic motor evoked potential monitoring in patients undergoing spinal surgery.

Authors:  Hironobu Hayashi; Masahiko Kawaguchi; Ryuichi Abe; Yuri Yamamoto; Satoki Inoue; Munehisa Koizumi; Yoshinori Takakura; Hitoshi Furuya
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Differential effect of halothane on motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial electric or magnetic stimulation in the monkey.

Authors:  Tod Sloan; J Rogers
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.