Literature DB >> 10065723

Cementless fixation in 2-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic sepsis.

T K Fehring1, T F Calton, W L Griffin.   

Abstract

Twenty-five patients with documented infection of the hip were reviewed. All patients underwent reconstruction in a 2-stage fashion with cementless implants. The average follow-up in this group was 41 months. The average time to reimplantation was 4.8 months. Of the 25 living patients, 22 retained their implants. There were 2 recurrences of infection, for an infection recurrence rate of 8% (2 of 25). The average postoperative Harris Hip Score was 81. Bone ingrowth was confirmed radiographically via the Engh fixation score in all but 1 of the surviving implants. Cementless fixation in 2-stage reimplantation can result in acceptable eradication rates, while supplying predictable fixation, provided that appropriate cementless revision implants are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10065723     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90122-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  14 in total

1.  Sufficient release of antibiotic by a spacer 6 weeks after implantation in two-stage revision of infected hip prostheses.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Sebastian Vogt; Martin Reinsch; Hubert Büchner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Mechanical complications with one hundred and thirty eight (antibiotic-laden) cement spacers in the treatment of periprosthetic infection after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martin Faschingbauer; Heiko Reichel; Ralf Bieger; Thomas Kappe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Tertiary care centre adherence to unified guidelines for management of periprosthetic joint infections: a gap analysis.

Authors:  Mitchel D Armstrong; Alberto V Carli; Hesham Abdelbary; Stephane Poitras; Peter Lapner; Paule E Beaulé
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Similar outcomes between two-stage revisions for infection and aseptic hip revisions.

Authors:  Maik Hoberg; Christian Konrads; Jana Engelien; Dorothee Oschmann; Michael Holder; Matthias Walcher; André Steinert; Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Partial two-stage exchange for infected total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Timothy E Ekpo; Keith R Berend; Michael J Morris; Joanne B Adams; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Treatment of early postoperative infections after THA: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Hany Bedair; Nicholas Ting; Kevin J Bozic; Craig J Della Valle; Scott M Sporer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Midterm to long-term followup of staged reimplantation for infected hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Daniel J Berry; Arlen D Hanssen; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Two-stage treatment of hip periprosthetic joint infection is associated with a high rate of infection control but high mortality.

Authors:  Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Michael J Morris; Adam G Bergeson; Joanne B Adams; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Two-stage cementless revision of infected hip endoprostheses.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Alexandra Grossmann; Martin Fuerst; Peter Schäfer; Lars Frommelt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.