Literature DB >> 10065075

Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: pattern of use and health care system costs.

I A Olivotto1, L Kan, D Mates, S King.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of mammography for screening asymptomatic women has increased dramatically in the past decade. This report describes the changes that have occurred in the use of bilateral mammography in British Columbia since the provincial breast cancer screening program began in 1988.
METHODS: Using province-wide databases from both the breast cancer screening program and the provincial health insurance plan in BC, the authors determined the number and costs of bilateral mammography services for women aged 40 years or older between Apr. 1, 1986, and Mar. 31, 1997. Unilateral mammography was excluded because it is used for investigating symptomatic disease and screening abnormalities, and for follow-up of women who have undergone mastectomy for cancer.
RESULTS: As the provincial breast cancer screening program expanded from 1 site in 1988 to 23 in 1997, it provided an increasing proportion of the bilateral mammographic examinations carried out each year in BC. In fiscal year 1996/97, 65% of bilateral mammographic examinations were performed through the screening program. The cost per examination within the screening program dropped as volume increased. Thirty percent more bilateral mammography examinations were done in 1996/97 than in 1991/92, but health care system expenditures for these services increased by only 4% during the same period. In calendar year 1996, 21% of new breast cancers were diagnosed as a result of a screening program visit.
INTERPRETATION: Substantial increases in health care expenditures have been avoided by shifting bilateral mammography services to the provincial screening program, which has a lower cost per screening visit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10065075      PMCID: PMC1230035     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  15 in total

1.  Recent trends in U.S. breast cancer incidence, survival, and mortality rates.

Authors:  K C Chu; R E Tarone; L G Kessler; L A Ries; B F Hankey; B A Miller; B K Edwards
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1996-11-06       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Whose guidelines are they, anyway? Mammography utilization in Ontario.

Authors:  V Goel
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1996 May-Jun

3.  The relative diagnostic impact of screening mammography and physical examination.

Authors:  D H Taves; L I McCurdy; R K Sparrow
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.248

4.  Trends in mammography utilization, 1981 to 1994.

Authors:  L A Gaudette; C A Altmayer; K M Nobrega; J Lee
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.796

5.  Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Kerlikowske; D Grady; S M Rubin; C Sandrock; V L Ernster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-11       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials.

Authors:  L Nyström; L E Rutqvist; S Wall; A Lindgren; M Lindqvist; S Rydén; I Andersson; N Bjurstam; G Fagerberg; J Frisell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-04-17       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Post screen-detected breast cancer within the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia.

Authors:  T G Hislop; A J Worth; L Kan; E Rousseau
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Screening mammography in British Columbia: 1988-1993.

Authors:  M G Clay; T G Hislop; L Kan; I A Olivotto; L J Burhenne
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Changes in the use of screening mammography: evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys.

Authors:  N Breen; L Kessler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  L Tabàr; G Fagerberg; S W Duffy; N E Day; A Gad; O Gröntoft
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.303

View more
  2 in total

1.  Differences in breast cancer diagnosis by patient presentation in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Steven Habbous; Esha Homenauth; Andriana Barisic; Sharmilaa Kandasamy; Vicky Majpruz; Katharina Forster; Marta Yurcan; Anna M Chiarelli; Patti Groome; Claire M B Holloway; Andrea Eisen
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2022-04-05

2.  Cost savings associated with improving appropriate and reducing inappropriate preventive care: cost-consequences analysis.

Authors:  William Hogg; Neill Baskerville; Jacques Lemelin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.