Literature DB >> 10036665

Computed radiography dual energy subtraction: performance evaluation when detecting low-contrast lung nodules in an anthropomorphic phantom.

C Kimme-Smith1, D L Davis, M McNitt-Gray, J Goldin, E Hart, P Batra, T D Johnson.   

Abstract

A dedicated chest computed radiography (CR) system has an option of energy subtraction (ES) acquisition. Two imaging plates, rather than one, are separated by a copper filter to give a high-energy and low-energy image. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of conventional computed radiography to that of ES obtained with two radiographic techniques. One soft tissue only image was obtained at the conventional CR technique (s = 254) and the second was obtained at twice the radiation exposure (s = 131) to reduce noise. An anthropomorphic phantom with superimposed low-contrast lung nodules was imaged 53 times for each radiographic technique. Fifteen images had no nodules; 38 images had a total of 90 nodules placed on the phantom. Three chest radiologists read the three sets of images in a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study. Significant differences in Az were only found between (1) the higher exposure energy subtracted images and the conventional dose energy subtracted images (P = .095, 90% confidence), and (2) the conventional CR and the energy subtracted image obtained at the same technique (P = .024, 98% confidence). As a result of this study, energy subtracted images cannot be substituted for conventional CR images when detecting low-contrast nodules, even when twice the exposure is used to obtain them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10036665      PMCID: PMC3452434          DOI: 10.1007/bf03168624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  15 in total

1.  Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.

Authors:  J T Dobbins; J J Rice; C A Beam; C E Ravin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography.

Authors:  B K Stewart; H K Huang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Lesion conspicuity, structured noise, and film reader error.

Authors:  H L Kundel; G Revesz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Proposition: medical technologies should pass performance and cost-effectiveness review in centers of excellence before being released for diffusion in the clinical community.

Authors:  C A Kelsey; G Cohen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Detection of simulated lung nodules with computed radiography: effects of nodule size, local optical density, global object thickness, and exposure.

Authors:  C Kimme-Smith; E M Hart; J G Goldin; T D Johnson; R Terwilliger; D R Aberle
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  One-shot dual-energy subtraction chest imaging with computed radiography: clinical evaluation of film images.

Authors:  T Ishigaki; S Sakuma; M Ikeda
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Quality control of storage phosphor digital radiography systems.

Authors:  M Freedman; D Steller; H Jafroudi; S K Mun
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.

Authors:  C Kimme-Smith; D R Aberle; J W Sayre; E M Hart; S M Greaves; K Brown; D A Young; M D Deseran; T Johnson; S L Johnson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  A method for selective tissue and bone visualization using dual energy scanned projection radiography.

Authors:  W R Brody; G Butt; A Hall; A Macovski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1981 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.