Literature DB >> 23658069

Missing minorities? The phases of IRCA legislation and relative net undercounts of the 1990 vis-à-vis 2000 decennial census for foreign-born cohorts.

Matheu Kaneshiro1.   

Abstract

The quality of the decennial census of the United States is compromised by population undercount, which often misses immigrants and racial/ethnic minorities, thereby diminishing federal resources allocated to such groups. Using a modified version of demographic analysis and informed by the latest contributions of emigration scholarship, this research estimates net undercount for the 1990 census relative to the 2000 census by age, sex, year-of-entry, and place-of-birth cohorts. Ordinary least squares estimates suggest that males, recent arrivals, and cohorts aged 15-44 had higher relative net undercount for 1990 compared with 2000. Much higher relative net undercount was found for cohorts from Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean (excluding Cuba and Puerto Rico) who were ineligible for amnesty under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (i.e., those fitting the profile of an undocumented immigrant). Larger implications of these findings suggest that the political climate in which a person is embedded-particularly for persons who may feel threatened or marginalized by the government and/or the public-affects that person's willingness to respond to the census.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23658069     DOI: 10.1007/s13524-013-0212-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Demography        ISSN: 0070-3370


  9 in total

1.  Estimation of population coverage in the 1990 United States census based on demographic analysis.

Authors:  J G Robinson; B Ahmed; P Das Gupta; K A Woodrow
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  Accuracy of the 1990 census and undercount adjustments.

Authors:  M H Mulry; B D Spencer
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Change in the undocumented alien population in the United States, 1979-1983.

Authors:  J S Passel; K A Woodrow
Journal:  Int Migr Rev       Date:  1987

4.  Paradox lost: explaining the Hispanic adult mortality advantage.

Authors:  Alberto Palloni; Elizabeth Arias
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2004-08

5.  How much do we count? Interpretation and error-making in the decennial census.

Authors:  R R Iversen; F F Furstenberg; A A Belzer
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1999-02

6.  Coming to stay: an analysis of the U.S. census question on immigrants' year of arrival.

Authors:  Ilana Redstone; Douglas S Massey
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2004-11

7.  Foreign-born emigration: a new approach and estimates based on matched CPS files.

Authors:  Jennifer Van Hook; Weiwei Zhang; Frank D Bean; Jeffrey S Passel
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2006-05

8.  Census undercount and the undercount of the Black population.

Authors:  P Nguyen
Journal:  West J Black Stud       Date:  1996

9.  Adjusting the 1990 census.

Authors:  D A Freedman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-05-31       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Our Health Counts Toronto: using respondent-driven sampling to unmask census undercounts of an urban indigenous population in Toronto, Canada.

Authors:  Michael A Rotondi; Patricia O'Campo; Kristen O'Brien; Michelle Firestone; Sara H Wolfe; Cheryllee Bourgeois; Janet K Smylie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Exploring Race and Ethnicity Representational Inequities in Illinois Medical Schools.

Authors:  Nicolás O Francone; Melissa A Simon; Pilar Ortega
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2021-08-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.