Literature DB >> 10030247

In vivo dosimetry during external photon beam radiotherapy.

M Essers1, B J Mijnheer.   

Abstract

In this critical review of the current practice of patient dose verification, we first demonstrate that a high accuracy (about 1-2%, 1 SD) can be obtained. Accurate in vivo dosimetry is possible if diodes and thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs), the main detector types in use for in vivo dosimetry, are carefully calibrated and the factors influencing their sensitivity are taken into account. Various methods and philosophies for applying patient dose verification are then evaluated: the measurement of each field for each fraction of each patient, a limited number of checks for all patients, or measurements of specific patient groups, for example, during total body irradiation (TBI) or conformal radiotherapy. The experience of a number of centers is then presented, providing information on the various types of errors detected by in vivo dosimetry, including their frequency and magnitude. From the results of recent studies it can be concluded that in centers having modern equipment with verification systems as well as comprehensive quality assurance (QA) programs, a systematic error larger than 5% in dose delivery is still present for 0.5-1% of the patient treatments. In other studies, a frequency of 3-10% of errors was observed for specific patient groups or when no verification system was present at the accelerator. These results were balanced against the additional manpower and other resources required for such a QA program. It could be concluded that patient dose verification should be an essential part of a QA program in a radiotherapy department, and plays a complementary role to treatment-sheet double checking. As the radiotherapy community makes the transition from the conventional two-dimensional (2D) to three-dimensional (3D) conformal and intensity modulated dose delivery, it is recommended that new treatment techniques be checked systematically for a few patients, and to perform in vivo dosimetry a few times for each patient for situations where errors in dose delivery should be minimized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10030247     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00341-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  28 in total

1.  Clinical implementation of volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with ERGO++.

Authors:  Dirk Wolff; Florian Stieler; Brigitte Hermann; Katharina Heim; Sven Clausen; Jens Fleckenstein; Martin Polednik; Volker Steil; Frederik Wenz; Frank Lohr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  A generalized calibration procedure for in vivo transit dosimetry using siemens electronic portal imaging devices.

Authors:  Andrea Fidanzio; Francesca Greco; Laura Gargiulo; Savino Cilla; Domenico Sabatino; Massimo Cappiello; Cinzia Di Felice; Elisabetta Di Castro; Luigi Azario; Mariateresa Russo; Luciano Pompei; Guido D'Onofrio; Angelo Piermattei
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Investigation of an implantable dosimeter for single-point water equivalent path length verification in proton therapy.

Authors:  Hsiao-Ming Lu; Greg Mann; Ethan Cascio
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  An analysis of an implantable dosimeter system for external beam therapy.

Authors:  Robert D Black; Charles W Scarantino; Gregory G Mann; Mitchell S Anscher; Robert D Ornitz; Benjamin E Nelms
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Verification of Entrance Dose Measurements with Thermoluminescent Dosimeters in Conventional Radiotherapy Procedures Delivered with Co-60 Teletherapy Machine.

Authors:  O B Evwierhurhoma; Z A Ibitoye; C A Ojieh; Jtk Duncan
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

6.  Initial characterization of a gel patch dosimeter for in vivo dosimetry.

Authors:  C Matrosic; W Culberson; B Rosen; E Madsen; G Frank; B Bednarz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Pretreatment verification of dose calculation and delivery by means of measurements with PLEXITOM™ phantom.

Authors:  Paweł Wołowiec; Paweł Kukołowicz; Krzysztof Lis
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-02-04

8.  Toward a real-time in vivo dosimetry system using plastic scintillation detectors.

Authors:  Louis Archambault; Tina M Briere; Falk Pönisch; Luc Beaulieu; Deborah A Kuban; Andrew Lee; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  In patient dose reconstruction using a cine acquisition for dynamic arc radiation therapy.

Authors:  Angelo Piermattei; Andrea Fidanzio; Luigi Azario; Francesca Greco; Alessandra Mameli; Savino Cilla; Luca Grimaldi; Guido D'Onofrio; Boris Giuseppe Augelli; Gerardina Stimato; Diego Gaudino; Sara Ramella; Rolando D'Angelillo; Francesco Cellini; Lucio Trodella
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Evaluation of target dose based on water-equivalent thickness in external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Behnaz Ghanbar Moghaddam; Masoud Vahabi-Moghaddam; Alireza Sadremomtaz
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2013-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.