BACKGROUND: If women tend to forget and underreport their past oral contraceptive (OC) use, but the recall among cases is enhanced by the presence of disease, recall bias may explain some reported health effects of OC use. METHODS: Two different sources of information on lifetime OC use were compared for 427 (84%) of a community-based sample of 511 women aged 20-34: (i) structured interviews, using a life event calendar and picture display as memory aids, and (ii) a register of all prescriptions dispensed by pharmacies in the county since 1970. RESULTS: Interview data and pharmacy records showed high levels of agreement for any OC use, current use, time since first and last use, total duration of use, and for duration of use in different 'time windows'. But there was a tendency to under-report specific kinds of OC used in the past. CONCLUSION: Underreporting of OC use among non-cases would usually introduce little or no bias (as compared to pharmacy records) for this kind of interview and women. However, it may be preferable to use interviews for current OC use, and pharmacy records for specific kinds of OC used in the past.
BACKGROUND: If women tend to forget and underreport their past oral contraceptive (OC) use, but the recall among cases is enhanced by the presence of disease, recall bias may explain some reported health effects of OC use. METHODS: Two different sources of information on lifetime OC use were compared for 427 (84%) of a community-based sample of 511 women aged 20-34: (i) structured interviews, using a life event calendar and picture display as memory aids, and (ii) a register of all prescriptions dispensed by pharmacies in the county since 1970. RESULTS: Interview data and pharmacy records showed high levels of agreement for any OC use, current use, time since first and last use, total duration of use, and for duration of use in different 'time windows'. But there was a tendency to under-report specific kinds of OC used in the past. CONCLUSION: Underreporting of OC use among non-cases would usually introduce little or no bias (as compared to pharmacy records) for this kind of interview and women. However, it may be preferable to use interviews for current OC use, and pharmacy records for specific kinds of OC used in the past.
Entities:
Keywords:
Acceptors--women; Bias; Comparative Studies; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Usage--women; Data Collection; Data Sources; Developed Countries; Error Sources; Europe; Family Planning; Family Planning Programs; Measurement; Northern Europe; Oral Contraceptives; Research Methodology; Research Report; Sampling Studies; Scandinavia; Studies; Surveys; Sweden
Authors: Lindsey Enewold; Louise A Brinton; Katherine A McGlynn; Shelia H Zahm; John F Potter; Kangmin Zhu Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Elisabeth F Beaber; Kathleen E Malone; Mei-Tzu Chen Tang; William E Barlow; Peggy L Porter; Janet R Daling; Christopher I Li Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-03-14 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Leslie Spangler; Laura E Ichikawa; Rebecca A Hubbard; Belinda Operskalski; Andrea Z LaCroix; Susan M Ott; Delia Scholes Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Larissa R Brunner Huber; Elizabeth C Broel; Ashley N Mitchelides; Jacek Dmochowski; Michael Dulin; Delia Scholes Journal: Contraception Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Elisabeth F Beaber; Diana S M Buist; William E Barlow; Kathleen E Malone; Susan D Reed; Christopher I Li Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Kristen A Hahn; Elizabeth E Hatch; Kenneth J Rothman; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Susan B Brogly; Henrik T Sørensen; Anders H Riis; Lauren A Wise Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Rachel E J Roach; Frans M Helmerhorst; Willem M Lijfering; Theo Stijnen; Ale Algra; Olaf M Dekkers Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-08-27