OBJECTIVE: To compare oral contraceptive (OC) use during a 12-month period among women aged 18-39 years in the U.S. military and the general U.S. population using data from the Military Health System Management Analysis and Reporting Tool (M2) and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), respectively. METHODS: OC use was age adjusted to the 2000 U.S. Census population. Comparisons between the military (n = 83,181) and the general population (unweighted n = 360), as well as between the military branches, were conducted overall and stratified by age, race/ethnicity, and marital status. RESULTS: OC use was higher in the military (34%) than in the general population (29%, p < 0.05). This difference increased with age and was most pronounced among Hispanics (military, 32.2%; general population, 19.8%). Within the military, OC use was highest in the Air Force (39%) and lowest in the Army (30%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that OC use differs between the military and the general population and within the military by service branch. Further studies that assess whether OC use is related to variations in health outcomes between these two populations and within the military are warranted.
OBJECTIVE: To compare oral contraceptive (OC) use during a 12-month period among women aged 18-39 years in the U.S. military and the general U.S. population using data from the Military Health System Management Analysis and Reporting Tool (M2) and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), respectively. METHODS: OC use was age adjusted to the 2000 U.S. Census population. Comparisons between the military (n = 83,181) and the general population (unweighted n = 360), as well as between the military branches, were conducted overall and stratified by age, race/ethnicity, and marital status. RESULTS: OC use was higher in the military (34%) than in the general population (29%, p < 0.05). This difference increased with age and was most pronounced among Hispanics (military, 32.2%; general population, 19.8%). Within the military, OC use was highest in the Air Force (39%) and lowest in the Army (30%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that OC use differs between the military and the general population and within the military by service branch. Further studies that assess whether OC use is related to variations in health outcomes between these two populations and within the military are warranted.
Authors: Polly A Marchbanks; Jill A McDonald; Hoyt G Wilson; Suzanne G Folger; Michele G Mandel; Janet R Daling; Leslie Bernstein; Kathleen E Malone; Giske Ursin; Brian L Strom; Sandra A Norman; Phyllis A Wingo; Ronald T Burkman; Jesse A Berlin; Michael S Simon; Robert Spirtas; Linda K Weiss Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-06-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Victor Moreno; F Xavier Bosch; Nubia Muñoz; Chris J L M Meijer; Keerti V Shah; Jan M M Walboomers; Rolando Herrero; Silvia Franceschi Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-03-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michelle D Althuis; Donna D Brogan; Ralph J Coates; Janet R Daling; Marilie D Gammon; Kathleen E Malone; Janet B Schoenberg; Louise A Brinton Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: M D Althuis; D R Brogan; R J Coates; J R Daling; M D Gammon; K E Malone; J B Schoenberg; L A Brinton Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2003-01-13 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Viviana Mucci; Josephine M Canceri; Rachael Brown; Mingjia Dai; Sergei B Yakushin; Shaun Watson; Angelique Van Ombergen; Yves Jacquemyn; Paul Fahey; Paul H Van de Heyning; Floris Wuyts; Cherylea J Browne Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Pierre Akilimali; Philip Anglewicz; Henri Nzuka Engale; Gilbert Kabanda Kurhenga; Julie Hernandez; Patrick Kayembe; Jane Bertrand Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-12-22 Impact factor: 2.692