Literature DB >> 9990866

Alterations of p16-pRb pathway and chromosome locus 9p21-22 in sporadic invasive breast carcinomas.

V G Gorgoulis1, E N Koutroumbi, A Kotsinas, P Zacharatos, C Markopoulos, L Giannikos, V Kyriakou, Z Voulgaris, I Gogas, C Kittas.   

Abstract

The p16-pRb pathway represents a vital cell-cycle checkpoint. In the present study we investigated the alterations of this G1-phase protein pathway using immunohistochemical and molecular methods in a series of 55 breast carcinomas and correlated the findings with clinicopathological features of the patients. Furthermore, we examined its relationship with the status of the chromosomal region 9p21-22 performing a deletion map analysis because there are indications that, in addition to CDKN2 and MTS2/p15(INK4B) tumor suppressor genes (TSGs), this area harbors other TSG(s). Aberrant expression (Ab) of p16 and pRb was observed in 26 (47%) and 16 (29%) of the carcinomas, respectively. A statistical trend pointing out an inverse relationship between p16 and pRb expression was found (p = 0.079). Analysis of the region that encodes for p16 by deletion mapping, a PCR-based methylation assay and PCR-SSCP, revealed that deletions and transcriptional silencing by methylation might represent the main mechanisms of CDKN2/p16(INK4A) inactivation in breast carcinomas. The results of deletion mapping also suggest that another TSG(s) may reside at the 9p21-22 area particularly at the D9S162 loci and that co-deletion of this putative gene with CDKN2/p16(INK4A) may play a role in breast carcinogenesis. In addition, microsatellite instability (MI), a marker of replication error phenotype (RER+), was observed with a frequency of 16% in the area examined and was inversely related with loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Interestingly, most cases with MI at the region encoding for p16 were aggregated in a subgroup of breast carcinomas with no other obvious genetic and/or epigenetic CDKN2/p16(INK4A) alterations. We speculate that there is an additional mechanism of CDKN2/p16(INK4A) inactivation. The relationship of p16 protein level pRb, status, the p16-pRb combined immunoprofiles, and the microsatellite alterations detected at the 9p21-22 locus with the patients' clinicopathological parameters revealed two significant correlations: one between normal pRb expression and lymph node involvement (p = 0.0263), and the other between microsatellite alterations (LOH and or MI) and tumor size (p = 9.2 x 10(-3)). In view of the heterogenous nature of breast cancer, we suggest that in a significant proportion of breast carcinomas, deregulation of the p16-pRb pathway in association with another, as-yet unidentified, TSG(s) of the 9p21-22 region may play a role in initiating or progressing the oncogenic procedure, while in other subgroups, alternative molecules may play this role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9990866      PMCID: PMC2230392     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Med        ISSN: 1076-1551            Impact factor:   6.354


  74 in total

1.  The retinoblastoma gene in breast cancer: allele loss is not correlated with loss of gene protein expression.

Authors:  A Borg; Q X Zhang; P Alm; H Olsson; G Sellberg
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Currently active protocols in the EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.

Authors:  H T Mouridsen; T Palshof; W Mattheiem; R J Sylvester; N Rotmensz; R J Paridaens
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1984

3.  The retinoblastoma gene is frequently altered leading to loss of expression in primary breast tumours.

Authors:  J M Varley; J Armour; J E Swallow; A J Jeffreys; B A Ponder; A T'Ang; Y K Fung; W J Brammar; R A Walker
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Structural rearrangement of the retinoblastoma gene in human breast carcinoma.

Authors:  A T'Ang; J M Varley; S Chakraborty; A L Murphree; Y K Fung
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Retinoblastoma and p53 gene expression related to relapse and survival in human breast cancer: an immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  A Sawan; B Randall; B Angus; C Wright; J A Henry; J Ostrowski; C Hennessy; T W Lennard; I Corbett; C H Horne
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  Retinoblastoma and p53 gene product expression in breast carcinoma: immunohistochemical analysis and clinicopathologic correlation.

Authors:  M Trudel; L Mulligan; W Cavenee; R Margolese; J Côté; G Gariépy
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Lack of nuclear RB protein staining in G0/middle G1 cells: correlation to changes in total RB protein level.

Authors:  H J Xu; S X Hu; W F Benedict
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Loss of heterozygosity at selective sites on chromosomes 13 and 17 in human breast carcinoma.

Authors:  S Thorlacius; O Jonasdottir; J E Eyfjord
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 9.  Staging and follow-up of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  D W Kinne
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer; a study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years.

Authors:  H J BLOOM; W W RICHARDSON
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1957-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Loss of chromosomal integrity in human mammary epithelial cells subsequent to escape from senescence.

Authors:  T D Tlsty; S R Romanov; B K Kozakiewicz; C R Holst; L M Haupt; Y G Crawford
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Abrogated response to cellular stress identifies DCIS associated with subsequent tumor events and defines basal-like breast tumors.

Authors:  Mona L Gauthier; Hal K Berman; Caroline Miller; Krystyna Kozakeiwicz; Karen Chew; Dan Moore; Joseph Rabban; Yunn Yi Chen; Karla Kerlikowske; Thea D Tlsty
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 31.743

3.  Exploring the gain of function contribution of AKT to mammary tumorigenesis in mouse models.

Authors:  Carmen Blanco-Aparicio; Marta Cañamero; Yolanda Cecilia; Belén Pequeño; Oliver Renner; Irene Ferrer; Amancio Carnero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Novel presentation of a familial pancreatic cancer syndrome.

Authors:  Ajay V Maker; James A Warth; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Chromosome 9 arm-specific telomere length and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Yun-Ling Zheng; Christopher A Loffredo; Peter G Shields; Sahar M Selim
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Expression of p16 and pRB in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Eunah Shin; Woo-Hee Jung; Ja-Seung Koo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-07-01

7.  Analysis of the Cycilin D1/p16/pRb Pathway in Parathyroid Adenomas.

Authors:  Eva Cristobal; Begona Arribas; Juan Tardio; Jose A. AIcazar; Juan C. Matinez-Montero; Rafael Carrion; Jose R. Polo; Laura Gil; Marta Azanedo; Jose M. Rojas; Javier Menarguez
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.943

8.  Telomere length in blood cells and breast cancer risk: investigations in two case-control studies.

Authors:  Yun-Ling Zheng; Christine Ambrosone; Celia Byrne; Warren Davis; Mary Nesline; Susan E McCann
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Some molecular and clinical aspects of genetic predisposition to malignant melanoma and tumours of various site of origin.

Authors:  Tadeusz Debniak
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.857

10.  The functional loss of the retinoblastoma tumour suppressor is a common event in basal-like and luminal B breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Jason I Herschkowitz; Xiaping He; Cheng Fan; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.