Literature DB >> 9990680

Role and evaluation of mammography and other imaging methods for breast cancer detection, diagnosis, and staging.

S A Feig1.   

Abstract

Mammographic screening of women age 40 and older can reduce breast cancer deaths by at least 30% to 40%. However, not all cancers are detected by mammography. Although a new supplementary modality for screening could, in theory, fill in this detection gap, such utilization must be based on rigorous demonstration of its ability to consistently and frequently find early cancers missed by mammography, such as those occurring in dense breasts or rapidly growing interval cancers that surface clinically between mammographic screens. After an abnormality is found at mammographic screening, supplementary mammographic views and/or ultrasound are now used to match the finding with an ACR BIRADS final diagnostic assessment category to indicate the relative likelihood of a normal, benign, or malignant diagnosis so that routine screening, short interval follow-up, or biopsy can then be advised. Appropriate categorization will maximize early cancer detection and minimize false-positive biopsies. Application of a new imaging method to this type of diagnostic evaluation requires well-designed studies to determine its effectiveness for this purpose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9990680     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2998(99)80026-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  5 in total

1.  Refraction corrected transmission ultrasound computed tomography for application in breast imaging.

Authors:  Shengying Li; Marcel Jackowski; Donald P Dione; Trond Varslot; Lawrence H Staib; Klaus Mueller
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Assessing Inaccuracies in Automated Information Extraction of Breast Imaging Findings.

Authors:  Ronilda Lacson; Martha E Goodrich; Kimberly Harris; Phyllis Brawarsky; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Evaluation of an Automated Information Extraction Tool for Imaging Data Elements to Populate a Breast Cancer Screening Registry.

Authors:  Ronilda Lacson; Kimberly Harris; Phyllis Brawarsky; Tor D Tosteson; Tracy Onega; Anna N A Tosteson; Abby Kaye; Irina Gonzalez; Robyn Birdwell; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Breast cancer survival among economically disadvantaged women: the influences of delayed diagnosis and treatment on mortality.

Authors:  Emily Rose Smith; Swann Arp Adams; Irene Prabhu Das; Matteo Bottai; Jeanette Fulton; James R Hebert
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  The evolving role of the dynamic thermal analysis in the early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  M Salhab; W Al Sarakbi; K Mokbel
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-04-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.