Literature DB >> 9990632

Complications of third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.

W Grimm1, V Menz, J Hoffmann, U Timmann, R Funck, R Moosdorf, B Maisch.   

Abstract

To determine the incidence of complications of third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, 144 patients were prospectively studied who underwent first implant of third-generation devices (i.e., ICD systems with biphasic shocks, ECG storage capability, and nonthoracotomy lead systems). During 21 +/- 15 months of follow-up, 41 (28%) patients had one or more complications. No patient died perioperatively (30 days) and no ICD infection was observed during follow-up. Complications included bleeding or pocket hematoma (hemoglobin drop > 2 g/dL) in 5 (3%) patients, prolonged reversible ischemic neurological deficit in 1 (1%) patient, postoperative deep venous thrombosis of leg in 1 (1%) patient, pneumothorax in 2 (1%) patients, difficulty to defibrillate ventricular fibrillation intraoperatively in 2 (1%) patients, generator malfunction in 1 (1%) patient, arthritis of the shoulder in 3 (2%) patients, and allergic reaction to prophylactic antibiotics in 2 (1%) patients. A total of seven lead related complications were observed in six (4%) patients including endocardial lead migration in four (3%) patients. Twenty-three (16%) patients received inappropriate shocks for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (n = 13), non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (n = 7), or myopotential oversensing (n = 3). We conclude that serious complications such as perioperative death or ICD infection are rare in patients with third-generation ICDs. Lead-related problems and inappropriate shocks during follow-up are the most frequent complications of third-generation ICD therapy. Recognition of these complications should promote advances in ICD technology and management strategies to avoid their recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9990632     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00334.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

1.  Clinical benefit, survival and adverse events in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the initial Rotterdam experience.

Authors:  D A M J Theuns; A P J Klootwijk; G P Kimman; M L Simoons; J R T C Roelandt; L J L M Jordaens
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 2.  Are electronic cardiac devices still evolving?

Authors:  G Carrault; P Mabo
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

Review 3.  Methods of minimizing inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks.

Authors:  B Schaer; S Osswald
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Inappropriate shock delivery and biventricular pacing cardiac defibrillators.

Authors:  Brant C Liu; Rollo P Villareal; Ramesh Hariharan; Abdi Rasekh; Ali Massumi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2003

5.  First experience with the wearable cardioverter defibrillator in the Netherlands.

Authors:  R E Knops; K M Kooiman; J N Ten Sande; J R de Groot; A A M Wilde
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Complications and mortality of single versus dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Ataallah Bagherzadeh; Zahra Emkanjoo; Majid Haghjoo; Maryam Moshkani Farahani; Abolfath Alizadeh; Mohammad Ali Sadr-Ameli
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2006-04-01

7.  Generator and lead-related complications of implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Ahmad Yaminisharif; Nader Soofizadeh; Akbar Shafiee; Ali Kazemisaeid; Arash Jalali; Ali Vasheghani-Farahani
Journal:  Int Cardiovasc Res J       Date:  2014-04-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.