Literature DB >> 9988597

Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance.

B Hommel1.   

Abstract

In bottleneck models of overlapping-task performance, stimulus-response translation for secondary tasks is postponed until the primary response is selected. If this is so, then compatibility between the secondary and primary responses, or between the secondary response and the primary stimulus, should not affect primary-task performance. Yet such effects were demonstrated in 5 dual-task experiments combining primary manual and secondary vocal tasks: Pronounced effects of compatibility between the secondary and primary response and between the secondary response and primary stimulus were found on primary-task performance. The latter effect was also found with the lowest level of an extensive stimulus onset asynchrony variation, when the secondary task was not speeded, and even when the 2 tasks were performed on different trials. Findings suggest that secondary responses were activated before primary response selection was completed and thus support an automatic-translation hypothesis holding that, although eventual response selection may be serial, stimulus-response translation is performed in parallel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9988597     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.5.1368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  96 in total

1.  Automatic stimulus-response associations may be semantically mediated.

Authors:  Bert Reynvoet; Bernie Caessens; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

2.  The role of temporal unpredictability for process interference and code overlap in perception-action dual tasks.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Barbaros Metin; Stefanie Schuch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-03-15

3.  A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel; Robert W Proctor; Kim-Phuong L Vu
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-05-06

Review 4.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

5.  Crossmodal action selection: evidence from dual-task compatibility.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Iring Koch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

6.  Age-related emotional bias in processing two emotionally valenced tasks.

Authors:  Philip A Allen; Mei-Ching Lien; Elliott Jardin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-10-20

7.  Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Raffaella I Rumiati
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-10-08

8.  Selection and consolidation of objects and actions.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel; Christian F Doeller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-04-08

9.  The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Christine Stelzel; Eric H Schumacher; Torsten Schubert; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-21

10.  Memories of control: One-shot episodic learning of item-specific stimulus-control associations.

Authors:  Peter S Whitehead; Christina U Pfeuffer; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.