Literature DB >> 9987842

Differentiation of Lactococcus lactis subspecies lactis and subspecies cremoris strains by their adaptive response to stresses.

W S Kim1, J Ren, N W Dunn.   

Abstract

Lactococcus lactis subspecies lactis (L. lactis ssp. lactis) and Lactococcus lactis subspecies cremoris (L. lactis ssp. cremoris) were investigated in respect to their response to acid, bile-salt and freezing stresses. First, the sublethal and lethal levels of each stress were determined for both subspecies. For acid stress, the levels were pH 4.5 and 2.5, respectively, for L. lactis ssp. lactis, and pH 5.0 and 3.0, respectively, for L. lactis ssp. cremoris. For bile-salt stress, the levels were 0.03 and 0.1%, respectively, for L. lactis ssp. lactis, and 0.01 and 0.04%, respectively, for L. lactis ssp. cremoris. For freezing stress, 10 degrees C was used as the sublethal temperature and -20 degrees C was used as the lethal temperature for both subspecies. To evaluate the effect of each stress at log phase, a log-phase culture was challenged directly with the appropriate lethal level (control culture) and a second log-phase culture was pre-exposed to the appropriate sublethal level prior to testing survival under normally lethal conditions (test culture). Some, if not most, of the cells were killed in the control cultures for all three stresses. However, in the test cultures, the viability was significantly improved for all of the L. lactis ssp. lactis strains tested, but not for the L. lactis ssp. cremoris strains. It appears, therefore, that L. lactis ssp. lactis is capable of displaying adaptive response to stresses, whereas L. lactis ssp. cremoris seems to lack this phenotype or the response is much weaker in this subspecies. The effect of each stress on stationary-phase cultures was also investigated. Unlike the log-phase cultures, the stationary-phase cultures of both subspecies, challenged directly with the lethal levels, were highly resistant to each of the three stresses tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9987842     DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13412.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett        ISSN: 0378-1097            Impact factor:   2.742


  13 in total

Review 1.  Surviving the acid test: responses of gram-positive bacteria to low pH.

Authors:  Paul D Cotter; Colin Hill
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis as Potential Functional
Starter Culture.

Authors:  Jadranka Frece; Jelena Cvrtila; Ivana Topić; Frane Delaš; Ksenija Markov
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.918

Review 3.  Conditions of nisin production by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and its main uses as a food preservative.

Authors:  Simon Khelissa; Nour-Eddine Chihib; Adem Gharsallaoui
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.552

4.  Metabolic and transcriptomic adaptation of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis Biovar diacetylactis in response to autoacidification and temperature downshift in skim milk.

Authors:  Sandy Raynaud; Rémi Perrin; Muriel Cocaign-Bousquet; Pascal Loubiere
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Processed milk waste recycling via thermal pretreatment and lactic acid bacteria fermentation.

Authors:  Mariam Kasmi; Moktar Hamdi; Ismail Trabelsi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Heat and osmotic stress responses of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 (DR20) in relation to viability after drying.

Authors:  Jaya Prasad; Paul McJarrow; Pramod Gopal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Heat shock response in Lactobacillus plantarum.

Authors:  Maria De Angelis; Raffaella Di Cagno; Claude Huet; Carmine Crecchio; Patrick F Fox; Marco Gobbetti
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Proteomics analysis of Lactobacillus casei Zhang, a new probiotic bacterium isolated from traditional home-made koumiss in Inner Mongolia of China.

Authors:  Rina Wu; Weiwei Wang; Dongliang Yu; Wenyi Zhang; Yan Li; Zhihong Sun; Junrui Wu; He Meng; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Natural Lactic Acid Bacteria Population and Silage Fermentation of Whole-crop Wheat.

Authors:  Kuikui Ni; Yanping Wang; Yimin Cai; Huili Pang
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Adaptive Evolution of Lactococcus Lactis to Thermal and Oxidative Stress Increases Biomass and Nisin Production.

Authors:  Reyhaneh Papiran; Javad Hamedi
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.