Literature DB >> 9973019

A randomized trial comparing the impact of a nonionic (Iomeprol) versus an ionic (Ioxaglate) low osmolar contrast medium on abrupt vessel closure and ischemic complications after coronary angioplasty.

R Schräder1, I Esch, R Ensslen, W A Fach, H Merle, D Scherer, H Sievert, H F Spies, H E Zeplin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of nonionic versus ionic contrast media on abrupt vessel closure and major ischemic complications after coronary angioplasty.
BACKGROUND: There is a continuous debate about the "thrombogenic potential" of nonionic contrast media. The results of both in vitro and in vivo investigations are incongruent.
METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the outcomes of 2,000 patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). According to a randomized, double-blind protocol, they received either iomeprol (nonionic; n = 1,001) or ioxaglate (ionic; n = 999). Intracoronary thrombus before PTCA was found more often in the iomeprol group (4.2% vs 2.7%, p = 0.04). No other significant differences between both groups were observed with regard to pre-PTCA clinical and angiographic characteristics.
RESULTS: The frequency of reocclusions necessitating repeat angioplasty occurring either in laboratory (2.9% with iomeprol and 3.0% with ioxaglate) or out of laboratory (3.1% vs 4.1%) was not significantly different. The rate of major ischemic complications was also comparable after both contrast media (emergency bypass surgery: 0.8% vs 0.7%, myocardial infarction: 1.8 vs 2.0%, cardiac death during hospital stay: 0.2% vs 0.2%). In the iomeprol group, more patients had dissections post-PTCA (30.2% vs 25.0%, p = 0.01) and more patients received intracoronary stents (31.6% vs 25.7%, p = 0.004). Allergic reactions requiring treatment occurred only in the ioxaglate group (0.0% vs 0.9%, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The nonionic contrast medium was not associated with a higher rate of abrupt vessel closure requiring repeat angioplasty, or major ischemic events. These data suggest that nonionic contrast media do not increase the risk of thrombotic complications in patients undergoing coronary interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9973019     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00600-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  8 in total

Review 1.  Effects of iodinated contrast media on blood and endothelium.

Authors:  Peter Aspelin; Fulvio Stacul; Henrik S Thomsen; Sameh K Morcos; Aart J van der Molen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  An analysis of mechanisms underlying the antifibrinolytic properties of radiographic contrast agents.

Authors:  P M Farrehi; Y Zhu; W P Fay
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Iomeprol: a review of its use as a contrast medium.

Authors:  M Dooley; B Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Comparative tolerability of contrast media used for coronary interventions.

Authors:  Enrique Esplugas; Angel Cequier; Joan A Gomez-Hospital; Bruno García Del Blanco; Francisco Jara
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Catheter thrombosis and percutaneous coronary intervention: fundamental perspectives on blood, artificial surfaces and antithrombotic drugs.

Authors:  Mark Y Chan; Jeffrey I Weitz; Yahye Merhi; Robert A Harrington; Richard C Becker
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Influence of ionic and non-ionic radiographic contrast media on leukocyte adhesion molecules.

Authors:  Guy L J Vermeiren; Roel Willems; Marc J Claeys; Chris Vrints; Herman Slegers; Philippe G Jorens
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.711

Review 7.  Contrast media: are there differences in nephrotoxicity among contrast media?

Authors:  Richard Solomon
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Risks and complications of coronary angiography: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Morteza Tavakol; Salman Ashraf; Sorin J Brener
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2012-01-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.