Literature DB >> 10852647

Iomeprol: a review of its use as a contrast medium.

M Dooley1, B Jarvis.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Iomeprol is a nonionic, monomeric iodinated contrast medium. Unlike the older ionic agents, iomeprol has low chemotoxicity, osmolality and viscosity and high water solubility. Compared with other nonionic contrast media, the osmolality and viscosity are lower and the water solubility is reported to be higher with iomeprol. Most radiographs (about 67 to 100%) obtained with iomeprol (containing 150 to 400 mg/ml of iodine) were of good or excellent quality in noncomparative and comparative trials recruiting 40 to 6127 patients undergoing various radiographic procedures. As expected, the diagnostic efficacy of iomeprol did not differ significantly from that of other nonionic agents (iopamidol, iopromide, iohexol and iotrolan). Iomeprol (containing 150 to 400 mg/ml of iodine) was well tolerated in clinical trials. Most adverse events were transient and of mild to moderate intensity and were similar to those observed with other contrast media. The overall incidence of adverse events ranged from 3 to 49.7% and mainly included localised pain (< or =6%) and heat sensations (8 to 45%), taste disturbances (3 to 27%) and various pseudoallergic reactions (< or =20% for each type of event). The incidence of heat or pain and taste disturbances with iomeprol was similar to that observed with iopromide and iopamidol. Pain (but not heat sensations) was reported significantly less frequently and taste disturbances reported significantly more frequently with iomeprol than with iohexol in a comparative trial. Pseudoallergic reactions (such as nausea, vomiting, skin reactions, dizziness, headache) were significantly less common with iomeprol than with ioxaglate and occurred at a similar frequency to that with iopromide and iopamidol. Cardiovascular events were rarely observed with iomeprol. Currently available iomeprol solutions contain a range of iodine concentrations (150 to 400 mg/ml) and are approved for a wide variety of diagnostic procedures. Iomeprol solutions are chemically stable which negates the need for chelating agents. Formulations of this agent are therefore the first not to contain edetic acid (EDTA).
CONCLUSIONS: Iomeprol shows equivalent diagnostic efficacy, and a similar adverse event profile, to that of other nonionic contrast media. The availability of a range of iodine concentrations enables iomeprol to be used in a variety of diagnostic procedures. Iomeprol, like others in its class, is suitable for use in diagnostic imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10852647     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200059050-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  48 in total

Review 1.  High-osmolar and low-osmolar contrast media. An update on frequency of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  H S Thomsen; S Dorph
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 2.  X-ray contrast media: where are we now, and where are we going?

Authors:  T W Morris
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Cost containment in the use of low-osmolar contrast agents: effect of guidelines, monitoring, and feedback mechanisms.

Authors:  D C Levin; G A Gardiner; S Karasick; G S Shaber; R J Wechsler; G H McArdle; C D Lockard; R J Harford
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Toxicological safety assessment of iomeprol, a new X-ray contrast agent.

Authors:  A Morisetti; P Tirone; F Luzzani; C de Haën
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Effect of low-osmolality contrast media on red cell filterability.

Authors:  H Imai; H Hiruma; T Kumazaki; N Uyesaka
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.990

6.  Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of iomeprol in animals.

Authors:  V Lorusso; F Luzzani; F Bertani; P Tirone; C de Haën
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Preclinical safety assessment of iomeprol for injection as contrast medium for myelography.

Authors:  A La Noce; F Bertani; V Lorusso; F Luzzani; P Tirone; C de Haën
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Peripheral arteriography with a new nonionic agent: comparison of iomeprol with iopamidol.

Authors:  U Ugolotti; P Larini; C Marcato; F Cusmano; F Puccianti
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  A double-blind comparative study of the safety and efficacy of iomeprol in renal intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  G Simonetti; M Guazzaroni; L Carpanese; G C Canalis; F Urigo
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Iomeprol vs iopamidol in intraarterial peripheral digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  D Dacoronias; P Minguzzi; U Ugolotti; A G Dettori
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.619

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  A practical guide to diagnose lesser-known immediate and delayed contrast media-induced adverse cutaneous reactions.

Authors:  Ingrid Böhm; Hans H Schild
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Acute adverse reactions to iopromide vs iomeprol: a retrospective analysis of spontaneous reporting from a radiology department.

Authors:  M García; U Aguirre; A Martinez; B Ruiz; U Lertxundi; C Aguirre
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Evaluation with 64-slice CT of the prevalence of coronary artery variants and congenital anomalies: a retrospective study of 3,236 patients.

Authors:  G Bazzocchi; A Romagnoli; M Sperandio; G Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Effect of MR contrast agents on quantitative accuracy of PET in combined whole-body PET/MR imaging.

Authors:  Cristina Lois; Ilja Bezrukov; Holger Schmidt; Nina Schwenzer; Matthias K Werner; Jürgen Kupferschläger; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Decreased infarct volume and intracranial hemorrhage associated with intra-arterial nonionic iso-osmolar contrast material in an MCA occlusion/reperfusion model.

Authors:  H Morales; A Lu; Y Kurosawa; J F Clark; J Leach; K Weiss; T Tomsick
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Outcome Differences between Intra-Arterial Iso- and Low-Osmolality Iodinated Radiographic Contrast Media in the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial.

Authors:  T A Tomsick; L D Foster; D S Liebeskind; M D Hill; J Carrozella; M Goyal; R von Kummer; A M Demchuk; I Dzialowski; V Puetz; T Jovin; H Morales; Y Y Palesch; J Broderick; P Khatri; S D Yeatts
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Transient Global Amnesia After Cerebral Angiography With Iomeprol: A Case Report.

Authors:  Cristina Tiu; Elena Oana Terecoasă; Nicolae Grecu; Bogdan Dorobăţ; Andreea Nicoleta Marinescu; Ovidiu Alexandru Băjenaru
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.