Literature DB >> 9971920

Effects of mandibular incisor extraction on anterior occlusion in adults with Class III malocclusion and reduced overbite.

E Faerovig1, B U Zachrisson.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the treatment outcome and changes in mandibular incisor position after extraction of one single incisor in 36 adult orthodontic cases with combined Class III and open bite tendencies. The cases consisted of 21 female and 15 male patients with an average age of 27.8 years (standard deviation [SD], 11.1 years) at the start. Fixed 0.018-inch Edgewise appliances were used in both arches in 19 patients and in the mandibular arch in 17 patients. Average treatment time was 18 months (SD, 7.1 months). Pretreatment ANB was 0.5(o) (SD, 2.7 degrees), overjet 1.4 mm (SD, 1.9 mm), and overbite 1.5 mm (SD, 1.1 mm). The lower incisors were 3.6 mm (SD, 2.8 mm) in front of the APg-line, and the Averaged Irregularity Index was 1.1 mm (SD, 0.6 mm). Records representing pretreatment (T1), posttreatment (T2), and average 4.3 years (SD, 2.3 years) retention (T3) included cephalograms, panoramic films, intraoral and extraoral photographs, and plaster models. All cast measurements were made with digital calipers. On the cephalograms, the lower incisor tips moved posteriorly 1.7 mm (SD, 2.0 mm) and occlusally 1.5 mm (SD, 1.8 mm) from pretreatment to posttreatment. Relative to the x-axis, they tipped lingually 5.9(o) (SD, 5.6 degrees). On the cast analysis, overjet increased 1.0 mm (SD, 1.9 mm) and 1.5 mm (SD, 1.5 mm) for the maxillary central and lateral incisors, respectively, whereas overbite increased 0.6 mm for both the central and lateral incisors. The intercanine width was reduced by 3.3 mm (SD, 2.0 mm), while the intermolar width was unchanged. The Average Irregularity Index was reduced from 1.1 to 0. 2 mm. Arch-length was reduced 3.6 mm from pretreatment to posttreatment, and another 0.3 mm from posttreatment to 4.3-years retention. Other changes from posttreatment to 4.3-years retention were slight. No loss of the interdental gingival papillae was normally observed. It is concluded that the extraction of one mandibular incisor can lead to satisfactory treatment results in adults with mild Class III malocclusion and reduced overbite, particularly when coupled with a large mandibular intercanine width and minor crowding, and some mandibular tooth size excess. However, the orthodontic treatment frequently became more complicated and time-consuming than expected at the start.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9971920     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70337-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of objective and subjective treatment outcomes in orthodontic cases treated with extraction of a mandibular incisor.

Authors:  Sherry Lee; Fiona A Firth; Florence Bennani; Winifred Harding; Mauro Farella; Joseph S Antoun
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Dental compensation for skeletal Class III malocclusion by isolated extraction of mandibular teeth. Part 1: Occlusal situation 12 years after completion of active treatment.

Authors:  Bernd Zimmer; Sarah Schenk-Kazan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  A 15-year follow up of an orthodontic treatment including a lower incisor extraction and keeping the maxillary canine-premolar transposition.

Authors:  Soonshin Hwang; Insil Kim; Woowon Jang; Yoon Jeong Choi; Chooryung J Chung; Kyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Comparative evaluation of esthetic perception of black spaces in patients with mandibular incisor extraction.

Authors:  Matheus Melo Pithon; Adrielle Mangabeira Santos; Felipe Santos Couto; Lívia Maria Andrade de Freitas; Raildo da Silva Coqueiro
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Adult Class III treatment using a J-hook headgear to the mandibular arch.

Authors:  Yasuko Kuroda; Shingo Kuroda; Richard G Alexander; Eiji Tanaka
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Perception of the esthetic impact of mandibular incisor extraction treatment on laypersons, dental professionals, and dental students.

Authors:  Matheus Melo Pithon; Adrielle Mangabeira Santos; Felipe Santos Couto; Raildo da Silva Coqueiro; Lívia Maria Andrade de Freitas; Ricardo Alves de Souza; Rogério Lacerda Dos Santos
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Mandibular incisor extraction treatment of a class I malocclusion with bolton discrepancy: a case report.

Authors:  Mehmet Bayram; Mete Ozer
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2007-01

8.  Frequency evaluation of different extraction protocols in orthodontic treatment during 35 years.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Fábio Rogério Torres Maria; Roberto Bombonatti
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.750

9.  Mandibular incisor extraction treatment in Angle's Class I malocclusion with peg-shaped maxillary lateral incisors.

Authors:  Ankit H Shah; Darshit H Shah
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

10.  Evaluation of mandibular incisor extraction treatment outcome in patients with bolton discrepancy using peer assessment rating index.

Authors:  Sm Safavi; Ah Namazi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2012-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.