PURPOSE: To measure binocular function and patient satisfaction with monovision induced by photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in myopic presbyopic patients. SETTING: Refractive Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. METHODS: This study comprised 21 myopic presbyopic patients with monovision induced by PRK. Sixteen emmetropic patients who had PRK served as a control group. Monovision was induced by undercorrecting the nondominant eye by 1.25 diopters for near vision and correcting the dominant eye with emmetropia for distance vision. Monocular and binocular uncorrected Snellen visual acuities at 20 feet and 13 inches, manifest refraction, ocular dominance, stereopsis at 20 feet and 13 inches, monocular and binocular contrast sensitivities, Worth-4-Dot test at 20 feet and 1/3 of a meter, and fusional convergence amplitudes were examined in each patient. RESULTS: In the monovision group at near and distance, 20 patients (95.3%) had binocular visual acuity of 20/25 or better. No patient in the monovision group used reading glasses postoperatively; 4 of 16 patients (25.0%) in the control group used such glasses. All patients maintained binocular fusion and stereo acuity ranging from 40 to 800 seconds of arc. Mean patient satisfaction was 86% (range 40% to 100%). In the control group, 12 patients (75.0%) had binocular distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better and 11 (68.8%) had binocular near visual acuity of 20/25 or better. CONCLUSION: Monovision PRK patients had better near vision than control PRK patients, with minimal compromise in stereo acuity and overall high patient satisfaction.
PURPOSE: To measure binocular function and patient satisfaction with monovision induced by photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in myopic presbyopic patients. SETTING: Refractive Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. METHODS: This study comprised 21 myopic presbyopic patients with monovision induced by PRK. Sixteen emmetropic patients who had PRK served as a control group. Monovision was induced by undercorrecting the nondominant eye by 1.25 diopters for near vision and correcting the dominant eye with emmetropia for distance vision. Monocular and binocular uncorrected Snellen visual acuities at 20 feet and 13 inches, manifest refraction, ocular dominance, stereopsis at 20 feet and 13 inches, monocular and binocular contrast sensitivities, Worth-4-Dot test at 20 feet and 1/3 of a meter, and fusional convergence amplitudes were examined in each patient. RESULTS: In the monovision group at near and distance, 20 patients (95.3%) had binocular visual acuity of 20/25 or better. No patient in the monovision group used reading glasses postoperatively; 4 of 16 patients (25.0%) in the control group used such glasses. All patients maintained binocular fusion and stereo acuity ranging from 40 to 800 seconds of arc. Mean patient satisfaction was 86% (range 40% to 100%). In the control group, 12 patients (75.0%) had binocular distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better and 11 (68.8%) had binocular near visual acuity of 20/25 or better. CONCLUSION: Monovision PRK patients had better near vision than control PRK patients, with minimal compromise in stereo acuity and overall high patient satisfaction.
Authors: Robert Edward T Ang; Emerson M Cruz; Alex U Pisig; Maria Luisa Patricia C Solis; Rosalie Mae M Reyes; Gerhard Youssefi Journal: Eye Vis (Lond) Date: 2016-12-08