Literature DB >> 9950718

Cerebral mechanisms of hypnotic induction and suggestion.

P Rainville1, R K Hofbauer, T Paus, G H Duncan, M C Bushnell, D D Price.   

Abstract

The neural mechanisms underlying hypnotic states and responses to hypnotic suggestions remain largely unknown and, to date, have been studied only with indirect methods. Here, the effects of hypnosis and suggestions to alter pain perception were investigated in hypnotizable subjects by using positron emission tomography (PET) measures of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and electroencephalographic (EEG) measures of brain electrical activity. The experimental conditions included a restful state (Baseline) followed by hypnotic relaxation alone (Hypnosis) and by hypnotic relaxation with suggestions for altered pain unpleasantness (Hypnosis-with-Suggestion). During each scan, the left hand was immersed in neutral (35 degree C) or painfully hot (47 degrees C) water in the first two conditions and in painfully hot water in the last condition. Hypnosis was accompanied by significant increases in both occipital rCBF and delta EEG activity, which were highly correlated with each other (r = 0.70, p < 0.0001). Peak increases in rCBF were also observed in the caudal part of the right anterior cingulate sulcus and bilaterally in the inferior frontal gyri. Hypnosis-related decreases in rCBF were found in the right inferior parietal lobule, the left precuneus, and the posterior cingulate gyrus. Hypnosis-with-suggestions produced additional widespread increases in rCBF in the frontal cortices predominantly on the left side. Moreover, the medial and lateral posterior parietal cortices showed suggestion-related increases overlapping partly with regions of hypnosis-related decreases. Results support a state theory of hypnosis in which occipital increases in rCBF and delta activity reflect the alteration of consciousness associated with decreased arousal and possible facilitation of visual imagery. Frontal increases in rCBF associated with suggestions for altered perception might reflect the verbal mediation of the suggestions, working memory, and top-down processes involved in the reinterpretation of the perceptual experience. These results provide a new description of the neurobiological basis of hypnosis, demonstrating specific patterns of cerebral activation associated with the hypnotic state and with the processing of hypnotic suggestions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9950718     DOI: 10.1162/089892999563175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  51 in total

1.  Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing.

Authors:  Uta Frith; Christopher D Frith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Placebo effects in laser-evoked pain potentials.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Dagfinn Matre; Kenneth L Casey
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 7.217

3.  BIS monitor findings during self-hypnosis.

Authors:  Christopher M Burkle; Christopher J Jankowski; Laurence C Torsher; Edwin H Rho; Amy C Degnim
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Dynamic changes in brain activations and functional connectivity during affectively different tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Qing-Ping Hua; Xiang-Zhu Zeng; Jian-Yu Liu; Jin-Yan Wang; Jian-You Guo; Fei Luo
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 5.046

5.  Strength of prefrontal activation predicts intensity of suggestion-induced pain.

Authors:  Tuukka T Raij; Jussi Numminen; Sakari Närvänen; Jaana Hiltunen; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Hypnotic suggestion: opportunities for cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  David A Oakley; Peter W Halligan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 7.  The use of functional neuroimaging to evaluate psychological and other non-pharmacological treatments for clinical pain.

Authors:  Karin B Jensen; Chantal Berna; Marco L Loggia; Ajay D Wasan; Robert R Edwards; Randy L Gollub
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Cerebral and cerebrospinal processes underlying counterirritation analgesia.

Authors:  Mathieu Piché; Marianne Arsenault; Pierre Rainville
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The effect of opioid receptor blockade on the neural processing of thermal stimuli.

Authors:  Eszter D Schoell; Ulrike Bingel; Falk Eippert; Juliana Yacubian; Kerrin Christiansen; Hilke Andresen; Arne May; Christian Buechel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Complementary and alternative medicines in irritable bowel syndrome: an integrative view.

Authors:  Oliver Grundmann; Saunjoo L Yoon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.