Literature DB >> 993746

Effect of identity in the multiletter matching task.

D A Taylor.   

Abstract

This study was concerned with the nature of the character-comparison process involved in same-different judgments of arrays of letters. One condition replicated the standard matching task, with subjects pressing one key to indicate that the two arrays of letters were identical in all positions, and another key to indicate difference in one or more positions. A second condition reversed the standard decision rule and required the subjects to distinguish between arrays that differed in every position from those that matched in one or more positions. Reaction times were shorter to identical arrays in both conditions, indicating that identity effects observed in this and previous studies must be attributed to identity per se and not to decision or response factors. Mathematical analysis of the data revealed that, although a serial self-terminating model could be modified to give a good description of processing in this task, a model based on parallel processing was able to provide a better account both quantitatively and qualitatively. The analysis also indicated that subjects reduced their average reaction times by terminating the comparison process prematurely on some trials, and this guessing strategy was shown to have important implications for the shapes of the reaction time functions observed in this task.

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 993746     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.2.3.417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

1.  Dimension-based attention in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Michael Pilling; Doug J K Barrett
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-07

2.  Instructional and probability manipulations of bias in multiletter matching.

Authors:  R W Proctor; D J Weeks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-01

3.  Evidence that the same-different disparity in letter matching is not attributable to response bias.

Authors:  R W Proctor; K V Rao
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-07

4.  An examination of response bias in multiletter matching.

Authors:  R W Proctor; K V Rao; P W Hurst
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-05

5.  Speed and accuracy of same and different responses in perceptual matching.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; M J Hacker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-09

6.  On the "misguided" use of reaction-time differences: a discussion of Ratcliff and Hacker (1981).

Authors:  R W Proctor; K V Rao
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-06

7.  A parametric investigation of multiletter matches.

Authors:  R W Proctor; P W Hurst
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-07

8.  Visual comparison processes: identity and similarity decisions.

Authors:  J P Cunningham; L A Cooper; C C Reaves
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-07

9.  The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs.

Authors:  Joo-seok Hyun; Geoffrey F Woodman; Edward K Vogel; Andrew Hollingworth; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.332

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.