Literature DB >> 6634361

Evidence that the same-different disparity in letter matching is not attributable to response bias.

R W Proctor, K V Rao.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1983        PMID： 6634361     DOI： 10.3758/bf03205898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN： 0031-5117


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Effect of identity in the multiletter matching task.

Authors:  D A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Probing Proctor's priming principle: the effect of simultaneous and sequential presentation on same-different judgments.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Reinstating the original principles of Proctor's unified theory for matching-task phenomena: an evaluation of Krueger and Shapiro's reformulation.

Authors:  R W Proctor; K V Rao
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Null effects of exposure duration and heterogeneity of difference on the same-different disparity in letter matching.

Authors:  R W Proctor; K V Rao
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

5.  A theory of perceptual matching.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Speed and accuracy of same and different responses in perceptual matching.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; M J Hacker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-09

7.  On the "misguided" use of reaction-time differences: a discussion of Ratcliff and Hacker (1981).

Authors:  R W Proctor; K V Rao
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-06

8.  A parametric investigation of multiletter matches.

Authors:  R W Proctor; P W Hurst
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-07

9.  Response competition effects in same-different judgments.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; W P O'Hara; B Eriksen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-09

10.  Judgments of sameness and difference: experiments on decision time.

Authors:  D Bindra; J A Williams; J S Wise
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-12-17       Impact factor: 47.728
  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching.

Authors:  T Van Zandt; H Colonius; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

2.  Same-different judgments of multiletter strings: insensitivity to positional bias and spacing.

Authors:  R W Proctor; A F Healy; T Van Zandt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-01

3.  Task-specific serial position effects in comparisons of multiletter strings.

Authors:  R W Proctor; A F Healy
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-08

4.  Instructional and probability manipulations of bias in multiletter matching.

Authors:  R W Proctor; D J Weeks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-01

5.  An examination of response bias in multiletter matching.

Authors:  R W Proctor; K V Rao; P W Hurst
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-05

6.  Further evidence for priming in perceptual matching: temporal, not spatial, separation enhances the fast-same effect.

Authors:  M H Chignell; L E Krueger
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-09

7.  Same-different judgments under high speed stress: missing-feature principle predominates in early processing.

Authors:  L E Krueger; M H Chignell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.