Literature DB >> 9934621

Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: habituation vs. refractoriness.

T W Budd1, R J Barry, E Gordon, C Rennie, P T Michie.   

Abstract

We examined whether the amplitude decrement traditionally found for the N1 peak of the event-related potential (ERP) with repetition of auditory stimuli results from the process of habituation or from the refractory period of the neural elements underlying the N1 response. These competing accounts of the process underlying the N1 decrement with repetition differ in terms of the predicted effects of variations in stimulus repetition and interstimulus interval (ISI). These predictions were examined using a short-term habituation design with a factorial combination of stimulus repetition and ISI. Forty-five subjects received 21 stimulus trains, each consisting of seven innocuous tones, all at 1 kHz except the sixth, which was a 1.5-kHz tone. Each subject was assigned to one of three ISI conditions (either 1, 3 or 10 s). The results provide little support for the view that N1 response decrement with stimulus repetition reflects a process of habituation. The present results provide greater support for the view that this decrement is based on the separate refractory periods or recovery cycle processes of at least two neural generators contributing to activity in the N1 peak latency range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9934621     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(98)00040-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  81 in total

1.  An approach to probe some neural systems interaction by functional MRI at neural time scale down to milliseconds.

Authors:  S Ogawa; T M Lee; R Stepnoski; W Chen; X H Zhu; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mapping repetition suppression of the N100 evoked response to the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Nash N Boutros; Klevest Gjini; Horst Urbach; Mark E Pflieger
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Short-term habituation of auditory evoked potential and neuromagnetic field components in dependence of the interstimulus interval.

Authors:  Timm Rosburg; Karen Zimmerer; Ralph Huonker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The hemodynamics of oddball processing during single-tone and two-tone target detection tasks.

Authors:  Michael C Stevens; Kristin R Laurens; Peter F Liddle; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  An fMRI study of the functional distinction of neuronal circuits at the sites on ventral visual stream co-activated by visual stimuli of different objects.

Authors:  Yul-Wan Sung; Masayuki Kamba; Seiji Ogawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Neonatal and fetal response decrement of evoked responses: a MEG study.

Authors:  Carolin J Sheridan; Hubert Preissl; Eric R Siegel; Pamela Murphy; Maureen Ware; Curtis L Lowery; Hari Eswaran
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Mismatch negativity: the contribution of differences in the refractoriness of stimulus-specific neuron populations.

Authors:  M D Evstigneeva; A A Aleksandrov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-10-15

8.  Manipulations of listeners' echo perception are reflected in event-related potentials.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; Benjamin H Zobel; Richard L Freyman; Rachel Keen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Distinguishing Neural Adaptation and Predictive Coding Hypotheses in Auditory Change Detection.

Authors:  Renée M Symonds; Wei Wei Lee; Adam Kohn; Odelia Schwartz; Sarah Witkowski; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Musical Meter Modulates the Allocation of Attention across Time.

Authors:  Ahren B Fitzroy; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.