Literature DB >> 9933809

Holmium laser resection of the prostate.

A Le Duc1, P J Gilling.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This review of holmium laser resection of the prostate (HoLRP) summarises the evolution, points of technique, results of clinical trials and ongoing research concerning this procedure.
METHODS: Over 3 years of experience with holmium resection/enucleation in two institutions is reviewed. Several open studies and 2 randomised trials are presented and the results discussed. Current work with holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in combination with intracavitary morcellation is also reported.
RESULTS: HoLRP results in fewer blood transfusions, less nursing contact time, less requirement for bladder irrigation, and a shorter catheter time and hospital stay than for patients treated with standard electrocautery resection of the prostate (TURP). Preliminary results suggest equivalent symptomatic relief, and relief of bladder outflow obstruction between the two procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Holmium prostatectomy continues to evolve. Preliminary experience suggests that it may be a viable alternative to TURP and appears to have some significant advantages. Newer techniques for tissue retrieval may significantly decrease the operating time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9933809     DOI: 10.1159/000019836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  8 in total

1.  [Transurethral enucleation of the prostate with the holmium: YAG laser system: how much power is necessary?].

Authors:  J Rassweiler; M Roder; M Schulze; R Muschter
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Operative time comparison of aquablation, greenlight PVP, ThuLEP, GreenLEP, and HoLEP.

Authors:  David-Dan Nguyen; Vincent Misraï; Thorsten Bach; Naeem Bhojani; James E Lingeman; Dean S Elterman; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Laser treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Ehab A Elzayat; Mostafa M Elhilali
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-04       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  [Blood loss and absorption in TURP vs. TUVRP under low pressure and high pressure conditions].

Authors:  F Bliem; M Lamche; R Janda; W Ilias; P Schramek
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Lasers for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: when is the fuss worth it?

Authors:  Werner W Hochreiter; Roger M Müller
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 6.  Holmium laser prostatectomy.

Authors:  R F Paterson; J E Lingeman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.862

7.  Comparison of Outcome and Quality of Life Between Thulium Laser (VelaTM XL) Enucleation of Prostate and Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate (B-TUEP).

Authors:  Yu-Ting Chen; Chen-Pang Hou; Horng-Heng Juang; Yu-Hsiang Lin; Pei-Shan Yang; Phei-Lang Chang; Chien-Lun Chen; Shu-Chuan Weng; Ke-Hung Tsui
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 8.  Impact of interventional therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia on quality of life and sexual function.

Authors:  A Hoznek; C C Abbou
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.862

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.