Literature DB >> 9933782

Visual fields in Short-toed Eagles, Circaetus gallicus (Accipitridae), and the function of binocularity in birds.

G R Martin1, G Katzir.   

Abstract

Visual fields were determined in alert restrained birds using an ophthalmoscopic reflex technique. The region of binocular overlap is relatively small: maximum width of 20 degrees occurs approximately 15 degrees below the horizontal, and the field extends vertically through 80 degrees with the bill tip placed close to the centre. Monocular field width in the horizontal plane is 139 degrees, and the field is asymmetric about the optic axis. The cyclopean field extends through 260 degrees, and the blind area above and behind the head reaches maximum width of 100 degrees close to the horizontal. At the frontal margins of the monocular field the retinal and optical fields do not coincide; the retinal field margin lies approximately 10 degrees inside the optical margin. This gives rise to an apparent binocular field that is twice the width of the functional binocular field. Interspecific comparisons show that the binocular field of Short-toed Eagles is similar in shape and size to those of bird species that differ markedly in phylogeny, ecology, foraging technique, and eye size. This suggests that these relatively narrow binocular fields are a convergent feature of birds whose foraging is guided by visual cues irrespective of whether items are taken directly in the bill or in the feet, as in eagles, and irrespective of the size and shape of the monocular and cyclopean visual fields. It is argued that binocular vision in birds results from the requirement for each monocular field to extend contralaterally to embody a portion of the optical flow field which is radially symmetrical about the direction of travel. This is in contrast to functional explanations of binocularity, such as those concerned with stereopsis, which present it as a means of extracting higher order information through the combination of two monocular images of the same portion of a scene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9933782     DOI: 10.1159/000006582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  22 in total

Review 1.  Vision in the dimmest habitats on earth.

Authors:  Eric Warrant
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  On the barn owl's visual pre-attack behavior: I. Structure of head movements and motion patterns.

Authors:  Shay Ohayon; Robert F van der Willigen; Hermann Wagner; Igor Katsman; Ehud Rivlin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The evolution of stereopsis and the Wulst in caprimulgiform birds: A comparative analysis.

Authors:  Andrew N Iwaniuk; Douglas R W Wylie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Head-bobbing of walking birds.

Authors:  Reinhold Necker
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Relative Wulst volume is correlated with orbit orientation and binocular visual field in birds.

Authors:  Andrew N Iwaniuk; Christopher P Heesy; Margaret I Hall; Douglas R W Wylie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 6.  The subtlety of simple eyes: the tuning of visual fields to perceptual challenges in birds.

Authors:  Graham R Martin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Schools of fish and flocks of birds: their shape and internal structure by self-organization.

Authors:  Charlotte K Hemelrijk; Hanno Hildenbrandt
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Vision during head bobbing: are pigeons capable of shape discrimination during the thrust phase?

Authors:  Laura Jiménez Ortega; Katrin Stoppa; Onur Güntürkün; Nikolaus F Troje
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Visual fields, eye movements, and scanning behavior of a sit-and-wait predator, the black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans).

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Falcons pursue prey using visual motion cues: new perspectives from animal-borne cameras.

Authors:  Suzanne Amador Kane; Marjon Zamani
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.