Literature DB >> 19921207

Visual fields, eye movements, and scanning behavior of a sit-and-wait predator, the black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans).

Megan D Gall1, Esteban Fernández-Juricic.   

Abstract

Foraging mode influences the dominant sensory modality used by a forager and likely the strategies of information gathering used in foraging and anti-predator contexts. We assessed three components of visual information gathering in a sit-and-wait avian predator, the black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans): configuration of the visual field, degree of eye movement, and scanning behavior through head-movement rates. We found that black phoebes have larger lateral visual fields than similarly sized ground-foraging passerines, as well as relatively narrower binocular and blind areas. Black phoebes moved their eyes, but eye movement amplitude was relatively smaller than in other passerines. Black phoebes may compensate for eye movement constraints with head movements. The rate of head movements increased before attacking prey in comparison to non-foraging contexts and before movements between perches. These findings suggest that black phoebes use their lateral visual fields, likely subtended by areas of high acuity in the retina, to track prey items in a three-dimensional space through active head movements. These head movements may increase depth perception, motion detection and tracking. Studying information gathering through head movement changes, rather than body posture changes (head-up, head-down) as generally presented in the literature, may allow us to better understand the mechanisms of information gathering from a comparative perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19921207     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-009-0488-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  14 in total

Review 1.  Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence.

Authors:  M A Elgar
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1989-02

2.  The retina of tyrant flycatchers: topographic organization of neuronal density and size in the ganglion cell layer of the great kiskadee Pitangus sulphuratus and the rusty margined flycatcher Myiozetetes cayanensis (Aves: Tyrannidae).

Authors:  João Paulo Coimbra; Maria Luiza Videira Marceliano; Belmira Lara da Silveira Andrade-da-Costa; Elizabeth Sumi Yamada
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 1.808

3.  Pattern recognition and active vision in chickens.

Authors:  M S Dawkins; A Woodington
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Visual fields in flamingos: chick-feeding versus filter-feeding.

Authors:  Graham R Martin; Nigel Jarrett; Phillip Tovey; Craig R White
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-10-25

5.  Frontal and lateral visual system in birds. Frontal and lateral gaze.

Authors:  P E Maldonado; H Maturana; F J Varela
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.808

6.  Binocular interaction in the optokinetic system of the crab Carcinus maenas (L.): optokinetic gain modified by bilateral image flow.

Authors:  H O Nalbach; P Thier; D Varjú
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

7.  Quantitative analysis of the retinal ganglion cell layer in the ostrich, Struthio camelus.

Authors:  D Boire; J S Dufour; H Théoret; M Ptito
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Total panoramic vision in the mallard duck, Anas platyrhynchos.

Authors:  G R Martin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The visual fields of the tawny owl, Strix aluco L.

Authors:  G R Martin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Vision and touch in relation to foraging and predator detection: insightful contrasts between a plover and a sandpiper.

Authors:  Graham R Martin; Theunis Piersma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  6 in total

1.  Visual coverage and scanning behavior in two corvid species: American crow and Western scrub jay.

Authors:  Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Colleen O'Rourke; Todd Pitlik
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Hawk eyes II: diurnal raptors differ in head movement strategies when scanning from perches.

Authors:  Colleen T O'Rourke; Todd Pitlik; Melissa Hoover; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Hawk eyes I: diurnal raptors differ in visual fields and degree of eye movement.

Authors:  Colleen T O'Rourke; Margaret I Hall; Todd Pitlik; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evolution of Collective Behaviour in an Artificial World Using Linguistic Fuzzy Rule-Based Systems.

Authors:  Jure Demšar; Iztok Lebar Bajec
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Orientation of Visual Space from the Perspective of Hummingbirds.

Authors:  Luke P Tyrrell; Benjamin Goller; Bret A Moore; Douglas L Altshuler; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Early Exposure to Water Turbidity Affects Visual Capacities in Cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis).

Authors:  Alice Goerger; Anne-Sophie Darmaillacq; Nadav Shashar; Ludovic Dickel
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.