Literature DB >> 9933733

Aging and the scope of visual attention.

S M Kosslyn1, H D Brown, I E Dror.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To discover whether some cognitive deficits associated with aging could be related to a restricted scope of visual attention.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study, with subjects in each age group receiving the same four conditions.
SUBJECTS: 24 elderly (mean age 65.2 years, 12 men and 12 women) and 24 young (mean age 21.8 years, 12 men and 12 women) matched for handedness, gender, and education level.
METHODS: SUBJECTS viewed a display that contained four light-gray squares arranged as if on the tips of a plus sign, then black X marks appeared and the subjects indicated whether one or two Xs appeared in the squares as quickly and accurately as possible. The time to respond and accuracy level were recorded. Two types of displays were used; one with squares spread out over a large area and one with squares condensed into a small area. In two thirds of the trials the size remained the same (with half being large, and half small), and in one third it changed (with half of these trials changing from large-to-small and half from small-to-large).
RESULTS: In the trials that had a consistent display size, the elderly subjects performed the task better with the smaller display, whereas the young subjects performed equally well with both sized displays. In addition, the elderly found it easier to shift from large to small scope than to maintain attention at the large scope; in contrast, the younger subjects found it easiest to maintain attention on a static display size.
CONCLUSIONS: The elderly prefer to focus attention on a smaller region of space than do younger people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9933733     DOI: 10.1159/000022071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontology        ISSN: 0304-324X            Impact factor:   5.140


  8 in total

1.  Impaired attentional disengagement in older adults with useful field of view decline.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Monica N Lees; John D Lee; Matthew Rizzo; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Attentional impairment in anxiety: inefficiency in expanding the scope of attention.

Authors:  Sadia Najmi; Jennie M Kuckertz; Nader Amir
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.505

3.  The effectiveness of an attention bias modification program as an adjunctive treatment for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.

Authors:  Jennie M Kuckertz; Nader Amir; Joseph W Boffa; Ciara K Warren; Susan E M Rindt; Sonya Norman; Vasudha Ram; Lauretta Ziajko; Jennifer Webb-Murphy; Robert McLay
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2014-09-16

4.  Enhancing Spatial Attention and Working Memory in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Camarin E Rolle; Joaquin A Anguera; Sasha N Skinner; Bradley Voytek; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Age-related changes in processing faces from detection to identification: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Sharon Daniel; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  Gaze distribution analysis and saliency prediction across age groups.

Authors:  Onkar Krishna; Andrea Helo; Pia Rämä; Kiyoharu Aizawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Developmental Changes in Natural Viewing Behavior: Bottom-Up and Top-Down Differences between Children, Young Adults and Older Adults.

Authors:  Alper Açık; Adjmal Sarwary; Rafael Schultze-Kraft; Selim Onat; Peter König
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-11-25

8.  Selective Age Effects on Visual Attention and Motor Attention during a Cued Saccade Task.

Authors:  Wendy E Huddleston; Brad E Ernest; Kevin G Keenan
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 1.909

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.