Literature DB >> 21948383

Attentional impairment in anxiety: inefficiency in expanding the scope of attention.

Sadia Najmi1, Jennie M Kuckertz, Nader Amir.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to attend to relevant visual information in a proficient manner is central to most day-to-day tasks. Research suggests, however, that this ability is compromised by anxiety such that anxiety results in narrowing the focus of visual attention.
METHOD: In the current study (N = 58), we used the Attention Scope Task [1999: Gerontology 45:102-109] to examine the hypothesis that low-anxious individuals would be more proficient than high-anxious individuals in their scope of attention, that is, high-anxious individuals would have a larger scope of visual attention than low-anxious individuals. Additionally, we hypothesized that low-anxious individuals would be more proficient than high-anxious individuals in their ability to expand their scope of attention.
RESULTS: Results revealed that, compared to low-anxious individuals, high-anxious individuals were impaired only in their ability to expand their scope of attention from a small area to a larger one. Inclusion of a depressed control group in the study revealed that our findings are specific to the effect of anxiety and not depressive symptoms.
CONCLUSION: Thus, high-anxious individuals do not appear to have a smaller absolute scope of attention but instead seem to have difficulty expanding their attention scope dynamically. We discuss our results in relation to cognitive inflexibility in anxiety.
© 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21948383      PMCID: PMC3569031          DOI: 10.1002/da.20900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Depress Anxiety        ISSN: 1091-4269            Impact factor:   6.505


  23 in total

1.  The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior.

Authors:  J A EASTERBROOK
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1959-05       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Narrowed attention; a psychological phenomenon that accompanies a certain physiological change.

Authors:  E CALLAWAY; D DEMBO
Journal:  AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry       Date:  1958-01

3.  Sympathetic activity and perception; an approach to the relationships between autonomic activity and personality.

Authors:  E CALLAWAY; S V THOMPSON
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1953 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.312

4.  The effect of fear on attentional processing in a sample of healthy females.

Authors:  Anne M Finucane; Mick J Power
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2010-01

5.  Aging and the scope of visual attention.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn; H D Brown; I E Dror
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.140

6.  Responding to subliminal threat cues is related to trait anxiety and emotional vulnerability: a successful replication of Macleod and Hagan (1992)

Authors:  M van den Hout; N Tenney; K Huygens; H Merckelbach; M Kindt
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1995-05

7.  A psychometric study of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.

Authors:  N V Ramanaiah; M Franzen; T Schill
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1983-10

8.  Processing of local and global visual features in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Steffen Moritz; Mike Wendt
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  The frequency of cognitive impairment in patients with anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder: an unaccounted source of variance in clinical trials.

Authors:  C Thomas Gualtieri; Dexter W Morgan
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.384

10.  Attentional bias to threat in social phobia: facilitated processing of threat or difficulty disengaging attention from threat?

Authors:  N Amir; J Elias; H Klumpp; A Przeworski
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2003-11
View more
  6 in total

1.  Effect of Threat on Right dlPFC Activity during Behavioral Pattern Separation.

Authors:  Nicholas L Balderston; Abigail Hsiung; Monique Ernst; Christian Grillon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  When cognitive control harms rather than helps: individuals with high working memory capacity are less efficient at infrequent contraction of attentional breadth.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-30

3.  The effects of cognitive load on attention control in subclinical anxiety and generalised anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Sadia Najmi; Nader Amir; Kristen E Frosio; Catherine Ayers
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2014-10-30

4.  The Short and Long-Term Effect of Sound Therapy on Visual Attention in Chronic Tinnitus Patients.

Authors:  Mie Laerkegaard Joergensen; Petteri Hyvärinen; Sueli Caporali; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2022-09-13

5.  The relationship between dlPFC activity during unpredictable threat and CO2-induced panic symptoms.

Authors:  Nicholas L Balderston; Jeffrey Liu; Roxann Roberson-Nay; Monique Ernst; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  The impact of COVID-19 related lockdown on ophthalmology training programs in India - Outcomes of a survey.

Authors:  Deepak Mishra; Akshay Gopinathan Nair; Rashmin Anilkumar Gandhi; Parikshit J Gogate; Satanshu Mathur; Prashant Bhushan; Tanmay Srivastav; Hemendra Singh; Bibhuti P Sinha; Mahendra Kumar Singh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.848

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.