Literature DB >> 9933527

Sex roles and sexual selection.

.   

Abstract

Sexual selection has been portrayed as acting predominantly on males who compete with each other over copulatory access to females; selection was considered to be driven by females choosing between males at the pre- or postcopulatory level. However, a broader view of sexual selection is now emerging. Examining male discrimination between females and female-female competition has been beneficial in identifying factors influencing the direction and strength of sexual selection. Furthermore, consideration of processes such as sexual coercion or genetic incompatibility, which indirectly influence an individual's set of copulation partners, gamete set or their offspring success, has helped to clarify the ways in which sexual selection may operate. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that not all copulations translate directly to paternity and that paternity does not necessarily translate into successful offspring. Postcopulatory and postfertilization mechanisms that influence not only paternity share but offspring recruitment now require further consideration. The benefits to each sex of copulating with particular partners or with more than one partner remains an area of debate. More carefully designed studies which eliminate alternative possibilities or quantify the relative importance of different selective pressures will also benefit from considering that not all copulations function solely to inseminate or receive sperm. It is also now clear that not all individuals of one sex follow the same strategy. Examining the variation between individuals in reproductive behaviour, fertilization success and offspring success will be important in establishing the selective pressures and mechanisms underlying the operation of sexual selection. (c) 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Year:  1998        PMID: 9933527     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  16 in total

1.  Indirect partner choice through manipulation of male behaviour by female fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus.

Authors:  T Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A model of the interaction between 'good genes' and direct benefits in courtship-feeding animals: when do males of high genetic quality invest less?

Authors:  Luc F Bussière
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Parental conflict and blue egg coloration in a seabird.

Authors:  Judith Morales; Roxana Torres; Alberto Velando
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-02

5.  Female sex pheromone-mediated effects on behavior and consequences of male competition in the shore crab (Carcinus maenas).

Authors:  Lynne U Sneddon; Felicity A Huntingford; Alan C Taylor; Anthony S Clare
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Consequences of thermal acclimation for the mating behaviour and swimming performance of female mosquito fish.

Authors:  Robbie S Wilson; Catriona H L Condon; Ian A Johnston
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Turgid female toads give males the slip: a new mechanism of female mate choice in the Anura.

Authors:  Bas Bruning; Benjamin L Phillips; Richard Shine
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Unexpected male choosiness for mates in a spider.

Authors:  M C Bel-Venner; S Dray; D Allainé; F Menu; S Venner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Male dominance rank and reproductive success in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii.

Authors:  Emily E Wroblewski; Carson M Murray; Brandon F Keele; Joann C Schumacher-Stankey; Beatrice H Hahn; Anne E Pusey
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Mate choice and toxicity in two species of leaf beetles with different types of chemical defense.

Authors:  Estelle Labeyrie; Wolf U Blanckenhorn; Martine Rahier
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.