Literature DB >> 9930431

Medtronic mosaic porcine bioprosthesis satisfactory early clinical performance.

D J Thomson1, W R Jamieson, J G Dumesnil, E F Busse, C M Peniston, J Métras, J G Abel, J A Sullivan, J C Parrott.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Medtronic (Minneapolis, MN) Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis is an investigational prosthesis which incorporates zero-pressure fixation, aortic root predilation, low profile stent, and alpha oleic acid antimineralization treatment.
METHODS: From September 1994 to August 1996, 289 patients (mean age 70 years, range, 28 to 88 years) had 227 (78.5%) aortic valve replacements and 62 (21.5%) mitral valve replacements. Concomitant procedures were performed in 61.2% (139) of aortic valve replacements and 54.8% (34) of mitral valve replacements. Of the aortic valve replacement group 70 (30.8%) were in the 61 to 70 age group and 134 (59.0%) were 71 years or older. Of the mitral valve replacements, 23 (37.1%) were 61 to 70 years and 30 (48.4%) 71 years or older.
RESULTS: The early mortality, overall, was 4.2% (12 of 289); for aortic valve replacement it was 4.0% (9) and for mitral valve replacement it was 4.8% (3). The late mortality for aortic valve replacement was 2.6% per patient-year (3 events, 1.3% of total) and for mitral valve replacement it was 3.3% per patient-year (one event, 1.6% of total). The reoperative rate for aortic valve replacement was 3.0% per patient-year (4), while there were no mitral valve replacement reoperations. The freedom from major thromboembolism was 97.3%+/-1.6% for aortic valve replacement and 94.7%+/-3.0% for mitral valve replacement at 1 to 1.5 years. The freedom from reoperation was 96.7%+/-1.7% for aortic valve replacement; there was no reoperation for mitral valve replacement. There were no cases of structural valve deterioration. In the aortic position the mean systolic gradient was low, approximately 11 mm Hg, across all sizes (range 8 to 12 mm Hg at 3 months and 10 to 13 mm Hg at 12 months). In the mitral position the mean diastolic gradient was approximately 5 mm Hg (range, 2 to 6 mm Hg) for all sizes 25 to 31 mm at the early and 1 year follow-up echocardiographic assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: The early clinical performance and in vivo hemodynamics are encouraging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9930431     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01128-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  3 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic evaluation of left-sided prosthetic heart valve dysfunction.

Authors:  Jesse Habets; Ricardo P Budde; Petr Symersky; Renee B van den Brink; Bas A de Mol; Willem P Mali; Lex A van Herwerden; Steven A Chamuleau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Factors determining patient-prosthesis mismatch after aortic valve replacement--a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Diana Bonderman; Alexandra Graf; Andreas A Kammerlander; Alfred Kocher; Guenter Laufer; Irene M Lang; Julia Mascherbauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis in East China.

Authors:  Lei Guo; Junnan Zheng; Liangwei Chen; Renyuan Li; Liang Ma; Yiming Ni; Haige Zhao
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 1.637

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.