Literature DB >> 9930414

Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: a 21-year experience.

W R Jamieson1, L H Burr, A I Munro, R T Miyagishima.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis experience to 21 years has been evaluated to determine the influence of structural valve deterioration by valve position in various age groupings.
METHODS: From 1975 to 1988, 1,181 patients had the prosthesis implanted in 1,198 procedures. The mean age of the population was 57.9+/-12.5 years (range, 21 to 85 years). Aortic valve replacement was performed in 564 patients (47.8%); mitral valve replacement, 478 (40.5%); and multiple valve replacement, 132 (11.2%). Concomitant procedures were performed in 337 patients (28.5%), and 140 (11.9%) had previous operations.
RESULTS: The early mortality was 8.1% (97), only 0.4% (5) of which were valve-related. The total follow-up was 10,405 years (mean, 8.8+/-5.2 years). The late mortality was 5.7%/patient-year (591), with the valve-related component 1.6%/patient-year (168) with a 13% reoperative mortality (56). The linearized rate of structural valve deterioration was 3.8%/patient-year (395), with overall complications of 7.1%/patient-year (737). The overall survival at 20 years was 17.2%+/-3.1% (p < 0.05; aortic valve replacement greater than mitral valve replacement or multiple valve replacement). The freedom from structural valve deterioration was, at 18 years, 25.8%+/-2.8% overall, AVR 40.6%+/-4.2%, and MVR 8.5%+/-3.4% (p < 0.05, aortic valve replacement greater than mitral valve replacement or multiple valve replacement). The freedom from structural valve deterioration for aortic valve replacement was, at 15 years, for patients older than 70 years, 82.9%+/-9.1%; 61 to 70 years, 73.2%+/-4.7%; 51 to 60 years, 58.8%+/-5.4%; 41 to 50 years, 41.7%+/-8.2%; and 21 to 40 years, 25.5%+/-7.8%. The freedom from structural valve deterioration for mitral valve replacement was, at 15 years, for patients older than 70 years, 89.8%+/-7.6%; 61 to 70 years, 22.8%+/-6.3%; 51 to 60 years, 26.3% +/- 5.7%; 41 to 50 years, 11.7%+/-5.6%; and 21 to 40 years, 7.0%+/-4.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: The prosthesis is recommended for aortic valve replacement for patients older than 70 years and for patients 61 to 70 years (when extended longevity is not anticipated) and for mitral valve replacement for patients older than 70 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9930414     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01124-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  8 in total

1.  Endovascular treatment of internal carotid and vertebral artery aneurysms using a novel pericardium covered stent.

Authors:  I Vulev; A Klepanec; R Bazik; T Balazs; R Illes; J Steno
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Quality of life before and after heart valve surgery is influenced by gender and type of valve.

Authors:  Marie-Christine Taillefer; Gilles Dupuis; Jean-François Hardy; Sylvie LeMay
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Pregnancy outcome and follow-up cardiac outcome in women with aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Snehalata Basude; Johanna Trinder; Massimo Caputo; Stephanie L Curtis
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2014-01-15

4.  Porcine versus bovine bioprosthetic valves in mitral position: does choice really matter?

Authors:  Karthik Raman; Anbarasu Mohanraj; Vijayanand Palanisamy; Bharat Kumar Mohandoss; Sivakumar Pandian; Anjith Prakash Rajakumar; Jacob Jamesraj; Ejaz Ahmed Sheriff; Valikapathalil Mathew Kurian; Rajan Sethuratnam; Ravi Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-07-23

5.  Complementary Role of the Computed Biomodelling through Finite Element Analysis and Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Transcatheter Heart Valve Thrombosis.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Laura Mazzocchi; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh; Simone Morganti; Jean-Louis Sablayrolles; Christophe Acar; Ferdinando Auricchio
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  An overlooked fact: thrombocytopenia following bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Mehmet Kizilay; Ferruh Elbir; Ahmet Arif Aglar; Unsal Vural; Ahmet Yavuz Balci; İbrahim Yekeler
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2019-04-04

7.  Investigation of failure modes of explanted porcine valves in the mitral position.

Authors:  Kun Liu; Wentao Feng; Xianda Yang; Jinglun Shen; Haibo Zhang; Yubo Fan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Effect of Rosuvastatin on Bovine Pericardial Aortic Tissue Valve Calcification in a Rat Subdermal Implantation Model.

Authors:  Seung Hyun Lee; Dae-Hyun Kim; Young-Nam Youn; Sak Lee; Hyun Chel Joo; Byung Chul Chang; Kyung-Jong Yoo
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.243

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.