Literature DB >> 9929453

Physiological optics in the hummingbird hawkmoth: a compound eye without ommatidia

.   

Abstract

The fast-flying day-active hawkmoth Macroglossum stellatarum (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) has a remarkable refracting superposition eye that departs radically from the classical principles of Exnerian superposition optics. Unlike its classical counterparts, this superposition eye is highly aspherical and contains extensive gradients of resolution and sensitivity. While such features are well known in apposition eyes, they were thought to be impossible in superposition eyes because of the imaging principle inherent in this design. We provide the first account of a superposition eye where these gradients are not only possible, but also produce superposition eyes of unsurpassed quality. Using goniometry and ophthalmoscopy, we find that superposition images formed in the eye are close to the diffraction limit. Moreover, the photoreceptors of the superposition eyes of M. stellatarum are organised to form local acute zones, one of which is frontal and slightly ventral, and another of which provides improved resolution along the equator of the eye. This angular packing of rhabdoms bears no resemblance to the angular packing of the overlying corneal facets. In fact, this eye has many more rhabdoms than facets, with up to four rhabdoms per facet in the frontal eye, a situation which means that M. stellatarum does not possess ommatidia in the accepted sense. The size of the facets and the area of the superposition aperture are both maximal at the frontal retinal acute zone. By having larger facets, a wider aperture and denser rhabdom packing, the frontal acute zone of M. stellatarum provides the eye with its sharpest and brightest image and samples the image with the densest photoreceptor matrix. It is this eye region that M. stellatarum uses to fixate flower entrances during hovering and feeding. This radical departure from classical Exnerian principles has resulted in a superposition eye which has not only high sensitivity but also outstanding spatial resolution.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 9929453     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.202.5.497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  12 in total

1.  Day-flying butterflies remain day-flying in a Polynesian, bat-free habitat.

Authors:  J H Fullard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A dinner dance.

Authors:  I R Schwab; E J Warrant
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Higher-order neural processing tunes motion neurons to visual ecology in three species of hawkmoths.

Authors:  A L Stöckl; D O'Carroll; E J Warrant
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Female Bicyclus anynana butterflies choose males on the basis of their dorsal UV-reflective eyespot pupils.

Authors:  Kendra A Robertson; Antónia Monteiro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The optical sensitivity of compound eyes: theory and experiment compared.

Authors:  Rikard Frederiksen; Eric J Warrant
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  The relative importance of olfaction and vision in a diurnal and a nocturnal hawkmoth.

Authors:  Anna Balkenius; Wenqi Rosén; Almut Kelber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Wide-field motion tuning in nocturnal hawkmoths.

Authors:  Jamie C Theobald; Eric J Warrant; David C O'Carroll
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The Orientation of Visual Space from the Perspective of Hummingbirds.

Authors:  Luke P Tyrrell; Benjamin Goller; Bret A Moore; Douglas L Altshuler; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 9.  Fuelling on the wing: sensory ecology of hawkmoth foraging.

Authors:  Anna Lisa Stöckl; Almut Kelber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Reducing the ecological consequences of night-time light pollution: options and developments.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Thomas W Davies; Jonathan Bennie; John Hopkins
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 6.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.