Literature DB >> 16048768

Female Bicyclus anynana butterflies choose males on the basis of their dorsal UV-reflective eyespot pupils.

Kendra A Robertson1, Antónia Monteiro.   

Abstract

Sexual and natural selection pressures are thought to shape the characteristic wing patterns of butterfly species. Here we test whether sexual selection by female choice plays a role in the maintenance of the male wing pattern in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. We perform one of the most extensive series of wing pattern manipulations in butterflies, dissecting every component of the 'bulls-eye' eyespot patterns in both ventral and dorsal wing surfaces of males to test the trait's appeal to females. We conclude that females select males on the basis of the size and brightness of the dorsal eyespot's ultraviolet reflecting pupils. Pupil absence is strongly selected against, as are artificially enlarged pupils. Small to intermediate (normal sized) pupils seem to function equally well. This work contradicts earlier experiments that suggest that the size of dorsal eyespots plays a role in female choice and explains why male dorsal eyespots are very variable in size and often have indistinct rings of coloration, as the only feature under selection by females seems to be the central white pupil. We propose that sexual selection by female choice, rather than predator avoidance, may have been an important selective factor in the early stages of eyespot evolution in ancestral Lepidopteran lineages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16048768      PMCID: PMC1559841          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  9 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of color vision in insects.

Authors:  A D Briscoe; L Chittka
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  The generation and diversification of butterfly eyespot color patterns.

Authors:  C R Brunetti; J E Selegue; A Monteiro; V French; P M Brakefield; S B Carroll
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-10-16       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  The genetics and evo-devo of butterfly wing patterns.

Authors:  Patrícia Beldade; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Female choice depends on size but not symmetry of dorsal eyespots in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana.

Authors:  Casper J Breuker; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Ultraviolet differences between the Sulphur Butterflies, Colias eurytheme and C. philodice, and a possible isolating mechanism.

Authors:  R E Silberglied; O R Taylor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-02-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Scotopic colour vision in nocturnal hawkmoths.

Authors:  Almut Kelber; Anna Balkenius; Eric J Warrant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-10-31       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Host-plant-derived variation in ultraviolet wing patterns influences mate selection by male butterflies.

Authors:  H Knüttel; K Fiedler
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Colour vision of the foraging swallowtail butterfly papilio xuthus

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Physiological optics in the hummingbird hawkmoth: a compound eye without ommatidia

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.312

  9 in total
  57 in total

1.  Biased learning affects mate choice in a butterfly.

Authors:  Erica L Westerman; Andrea Hodgins-Davis; April Dinwiddie; Antónia Monteiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  On the origins of sexual dimorphism in butterflies.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Oliver; Antónia Monteiro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A cis-regulatory sequence within the yellow locus of Drosophila melanogaster required for normal male mating success.

Authors:  Mark David Drapeau; Shawn A Cyran; Michaela M Viering; Pamela K Geyer; Anthony D Long
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The use of chemical and visual cues in female choice in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana.

Authors:  Katie Costanzo; Antónia Monteiro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Female butterflies prefer males bearing bright iridescent ornamentation.

Authors:  Darrell J Kemp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Accommodating natural and sexual selection in butterfly wing pattern evolution.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Oliver; Kendra A Robertson; Antónia Monteiro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Timing of male sex pheromone biosynthesis in a butterfly - different dynamics under direct or diapause development.

Authors:  Helena Larsdotter-Mellström; Rushana Murtazina; Anna-Karin Borg-Karlson; Christer Wiklund
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Residual reproductive value and male mating success: older males do better.

Authors:  Klaus Fischer; Jana Perlick; Tobias Galetz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Artificial selection for structural color on butterfly wings and comparison with natural evolution.

Authors:  Bethany R Wasik; Seng Fatt Liew; David A Lilien; April J Dinwiddie; Heeso Noh; Hui Cao; Antónia Monteiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Marginal eyespots on butterfly wings deflect bird attacks under low light intensities with UV wavelengths.

Authors:  Martin Olofsson; Adrian Vallin; Sven Jakobsson; Christer Wiklund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.