Literature DB >> 9929293

Optimal use of communication channels in clinical event monitoring.

W R Hogan1, M M Wagner.   

Abstract

We argue that the optimal use of communication channels in clinical event monitors is an important design consideration for these systems. We review the state-of-the-art in selection of communication channels, including our current approach--allowing users to choose the communication channel by which the event monitor sends each notification. We describe a new approach that we are in the process of developing. In this new approach, we view event monitoring as the decision of whether and how to send new patient data to a clinician and apply the principle of maximum expected utility to this decision problem. Our initial experience with this approach suggests that notifying clinicians of normal patient data may be of high utility. We also found that methods for explanation in uncertain reasoning may be necessary in this approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9929293      PMCID: PMC2232268     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  7 in total

1.  The Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center decision-support system as a model for implementing the Arden Syntax.

Authors:  G Hripcsak; J J Cimino; S B Johnson; P D Clayton
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1991

2.  BANTER: a Bayesian network tutoring shell.

Authors:  P Haddawy; J Jacobson; C E Kahn
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  Detecting alerts, notifying the physician, and offering action items: a comprehensive alerting system.

Authors:  G J Kuperman; J M Teich; D W Bates; F L Hiltz; J M Hurley; R Y Lee; M D Paterno
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1996

4.  Nurses, pagers, and patient-specific criteria: three keys to improved critical value reporting.

Authors:  K E Tate; R M Gardner; K Scherting
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

5.  An evaluation of explanations of probabilistic inference.

Authors:  H J Suermondt; G F Cooper
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1993-06

6.  Design of a clinical event monitor.

Authors:  G Hripcsak; P D Clayton; R A Jenders; J J Cimino; S B Johnson
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1996-06

7.  Effect of computer-based alerts on the treatment and outcomes of hospitalized patients.

Authors:  D M Rind; C Safran; R S Phillips; Q Wang; D R Calkins; T L Delbanco; H L Bleich; W V Slack
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-07-11
  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  The use of an explanation algorithm in a clinical event monitor.

Authors:  W R Hogan; M M Wagner
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Extended attributes of event monitor systems for criteria-based notification modalities.

Authors:  Ying Tao; Dongwen Wang; Edward H Shortliffe; Yves A Lussier
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

3.  Real-time notification of laboratory data requested by users through alphanumeric pagers.

Authors:  Eric G Poon; Gilad J Kuperman; Julie Fiskio; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Asynchronous automated electronic laboratory result notifications: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin H Slovis; Thomas A Nahass; Hojjat Salmasian; Gilad Kuperman; David K Vawdrey
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.