Literature DB >> 8018007

Effect of computer-based alerts on the treatment and outcomes of hospitalized patients.

D M Rind1, C Safran, R S Phillips, Q Wang, D R Calkins, T L Delbanco, H L Bleich, W V Slack.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospital computing systems play an important part in the communication of clinical information to physicians. We sought to determine whether computer-based alerts for hospitalized patients can affect physicians' behavior and improve patients' outcomes.
METHODS: We performed a prospective time-series study to determine whether computerized alerts to physicians about rising creatinine levels in hospitalized patients receiving nephrotoxic or renally excreted medications led to more rapid adjustment or discontinuation of those medications, and to determine whether such alerts protected renal function.
RESULTS: Laboratory data were observed for 20,228 hospitalizations, with documentation of 1573 events (instances of rising creatinine levels during treatment with a nephrotoxic or renally excreted drug). During the intervention period, doses were adjusted or medications discontinued an average of 21.6 hours sooner after such an event (P < .0001). For patients receiving nephrotoxic medications during the intervention period, the relative risk of serious renal impairment was 0.45 (95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.94) as compared with the control period, and the mean serum creatinine level was 14.1 mumol/L (0.16 mg/dL) lower on day 3 (P < .01) and 25.6 mumol/L (0.29 mg/dL) lower on day 7 (P < .05) after an event. Forty-four percent of physicians who responded to a questionnaire said that the alerts had been helpful in the care of their patients, whereas 28% found them annoying. Sixty-five percent wished to continue receiving alerts.
CONCLUSIONS: Computer-based alerts regarding patients with rising creatinine levels affect physician behavior, prevent serious renal impairment, preserve renal function, and are accepted by clinicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8018007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  110 in total

1.  Housestaff attitudes toward computer-based clinical decision support.

Authors:  R Grundmeier; K Johnson
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  The use of an explanation algorithm in a clinical event monitor.

Authors:  W R Hogan; M M Wagner
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

3.  Clinicians' response to computerized detection of infections.

Authors:  B H Rocha; J C Christenson; R S Evans; R M Gardner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Incorporating preventive care recommendations into clinical practice: how do we bridge the gap?

Authors:  J D Douketis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-04-20       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Wireless clinical alerts for physiologic, laboratory and medication data.

Authors:  M M Shabot; M LoBue; J Chen
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

6.  Enrolling patients into clinical trials faster using RealTime Recuiting.

Authors:  A J Butte; D A Weinstein; I S Kohane
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

7.  Multiple perspectives on physician order entry.

Authors:  J S Ash; P N Gorman; M Lavelle; J Lyman
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

8.  Controlled trial of direct physician order entry: effects on physicians' time utilization in ambulatory primary care internal medicine practices.

Authors:  J M Overhage; S Perkins; W M Tierney; C J McDonald
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  The contributions of biomedical informatics to the fight against bioterrorism.

Authors:  Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  What's so special about medications: a pharmacist's observations from the POE study.

Authors:  J D Carpenter; P N Gorman
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.