Literature DB >> 9929276

A comparison of neural network models for the prediction of the cost of care for acute coronary syndrome patients.

M B Ismael1, E L Eisenstein, W E Hammond.   

Abstract

Acute coronary syndromes have remained the focus of many clinical economic studies due to the increasing prevalence of the disease and the tightening of cost controls. An accurate descriptive cost model for this population would be a valuable tool for clinical researchers. With such a model, the relative importance of different factors upon the total cost of care could be determined through computer simulation. This study explored the use of different neural network architectures in creating a descriptive cost model. This was a difficult problem in that the costs span 3 orders of magnitude but the output variable of the neural network must be restricted to the range 0-1. Models that used logarithmic transformations and multiple modular networks were created and analyzed. It was found that the model with a single network and logarithmic transformation performed significantly better than other more complicated networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9929276      PMCID: PMC2232360     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  10 in total

1.  Acute myocardial infarction detected in the 12-lead ECG by artificial neural networks.

Authors:  B Hedén; H Ohlin; R Rittner; L Edenbrandt
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-09-16       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  A neural network model for predicting pancreas transplant graft outcome.

Authors:  S G Dorsey; C F Waltz; L Brosch; I Connerney; E J Schweitzer; S T Bartlett
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Impact of the operating physician on costs of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  P A Heidenreich; T M Chou; T M Amidon; T A Ports; W S Browner
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes.

Authors:  J V Tu
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Artificial neural networks: current status in cardiovascular medicine.

Authors:  D Itchhaporia; P B Snow; R J Almassy; W J Oetgen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  Application of artificial neural networks to clinical medicine.

Authors:  W G Baxt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-10-28       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Using neural networks to identify patients unlikely to achieve a reduction in bodily pain after total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  M H Schwartz; R E Ward; C Macwilliam; J J Verner
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  In-hospital cost of percutaneous coronary revascularization. Critical determinants and implications.

Authors:  S G Ellis; D P Miller; K J Brown; N Omoigui; G L Howell; M Kutner; E J Topol
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Use of a neural network as a predictive instrument for length of stay in the intensive care unit following cardiac surgery.

Authors:  J V Tu; M R Guerriere
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1993-06

10.  AIDS2: a decision-support tool for decreasing physicians' uncertainty regarding patient eligibility for HIV treatment protocols.

Authors:  L Ohno-Machado; E Parra; S B Henry; S W Tu; M A Musen
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1993
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of hospital charge prediction models for colorectal cancer patients: neural network vs. decision tree models.

Authors:  Seung-Mi Lee; Jin-Oh Kang; Yong-Moo Suh
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.153

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.