Literature DB >> 9929217

Physician order entry in U.S. hospitals.

J S Ash1, P N Gorman, W R Hersh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determine the percent of U.S. hospitals where computerized physician order entry (POE) is available and the extent of its use.
METHODS: A survey was sent to a systematic sample of 1,000 U.S. hospitals asking about availability of POE, whether usage is required, percent of physicians using it, and percent of orders entered by computer.
RESULTS: About 66% do not have POE available. Of the 32.1% that have it completely or partially available, 4.9% require its usage, over half report usage by under 10% of physicians, and over half report that fewer than 10% of orders are entered this way. Analysis of comments showed that many hospitals have POE available for use by non-physicians only, but that they hope to offer it to physicians after careful planning.
CONCLUSION: Most U.S. hospitals have not yet implemented POE. Complete availability throughout the hospital is rare, very few require its use, low percentages of physicians are actual users, and low percentages of orders are entered this way. On a national basis, computerized order entry by physicians is not yet widespread.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9929217      PMCID: PMC2232213     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  14 in total

1.  Computerized physician order entry and quality of care.

Authors:  D W Bates; G Kuperman; J M Teich
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 0.926

Review 2.  Computer-based physician order entry: the state of the art.

Authors:  D F Sittig; W W Stead
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: II. Impact on medical education.

Authors:  T A Massaro
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: I. Impact on organizational culture and behavior.

Authors:  T A Massaro
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Cross-site study of the implementation of information technology innovations in health sciences centers.

Authors:  J Ash
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

6.  Enhancement of clinician workflow with computer order entry.

Authors:  J M Teich; C D Spurr; J L Schmiz; E M O'Connell; D Thomas
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

7.  Impact of computerized physician order entry on physician time.

Authors:  D W Bates; D L Boyle; J M Teich
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1994

8.  Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial.

Authors:  C J McDonald; S L Hui; D M Smith; W M Tierney; S J Cohen; M Weinberger; G P McCabe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization.

Authors:  W M Tierney; M E Miller; J M Overhage; C J McDonald
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-01-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Effect of computer-based alerts on the treatment and outcomes of hospitalized patients.

Authors:  D M Rind; C Safran; R S Phillips; Q Wang; D R Calkins; T L Delbanco; H L Bleich; W V Slack
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-07-11
View more
  21 in total

1.  Multiple perspectives on physician order entry.

Authors:  J S Ash; P N Gorman; M Lavelle; J Lyman
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

2.  Assessing the implementation process.

Authors:  C Weir; C McCarthy; S Gohlinghorst; R Crockett
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

3.  Key attributes of a successful physician order entry system implementation in a multi-hospital environment.

Authors:  Asif Ahmad; Phyllis Teater; Thomas D Bentley; Lynn Kuehn; Rajee R Kumar; Andrew Thomas; Hagop S Mekhjian
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Does national regulatory mandate of provider order entry portend greater benefit than risk for health care delivery? The 2001 ACMI debate. The American College of Medical Informatics.

Authors:  J Marc Overhage; Blackford Middleton; Randolph A Miller; Rita D Zielstorff; William R Hersh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  A diffusion of innovations model of physician order entry.

Authors:  J S Ash; J Lyman; J Carpenter; L Fournier
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

Review 6.  A consensus statement on considerations for a successful CPOE implementation.

Authors:  Joan S Ash; P Zoe Stavri; Gilad J Kuperman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Involving users in the implementation of an imaging order entry system.

Authors:  David M Schuster; Suzanne E Hall; Carole B Couse; Debra S Swayngim; Keith Y Kohatsu
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  A cross-site qualitative study of physician order entry.

Authors:  Joan S Ash; Paul N Gorman; Mary Lavelle; Thomas H Payne; Thomas A Massaro; Gerri L Frantz; Jason A Lyman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Information technology and medication safety: what is the benefit?

Authors:  R Kaushal; D W Bates
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-09

10.  A conceptual framework for evaluating outpatient electronic prescribing systems based on their functional capabilities.

Authors:  Douglas S Bell; Shan Cretin; Richard S Marken; Adam B Landman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-10-05       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.