Literature DB >> 9927526

Phonemes, rhymes, and intelligence as predictors of children's responsiveness to remedial reading instruction: evidence from a longitudinal intervention study.

P J Hatcher1, C Hulme.   

Abstract

We present an analysis of data from a longitudinal intervention study with 7-year-old poor readers (Hatcher, Hulme, & Ellis, 1994). A battery of cognitive and phonological tasks administered before the intervention began revealed five separate factors: Phoneme Manipulation, Rhyme, Verbal Ability, Nonverbal Ability and Phonological Memory. We assessed the extent to which these factors were predictive of children's responsiveness to the teaching interventions they received. For reading accuracy, Verbal Ability, Nonverbal Ability, Phonological Memory, and Rhyme made no significant contribution to predicting responsiveness to teaching, while Phoneme Manipulation was a very strong predictor. However for reading comprehension, Verbal ability (but not nonverbal ability) made an additional unique contribution to predicting responsiveness to teaching. The results are discussed in the context of current theories of the role of intelligence and phonological skills in learning to read. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9927526     DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1998.2480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  10 in total

1.  Subgrouping poor readers on the basis of individual differences in reading-related abilities.

Authors:  Hugh W Catts; Tiffany P Hogan; Marc E Fey
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

2.  Neural systems predicting long-term outcome in dyslexia.

Authors:  Fumiko Hoeft; Bruce D McCandliss; Jessica M Black; Alexander Gantman; Nahal Zakerani; Charles Hulme; Heikki Lyytinen; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Gary H Glover; Allan L Reiss; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Longitudinal Stability of Reading-Related Skills and their Prediction of Reading Development.

Authors:  Jacqueline Hulslander; Richard K Olson; Erik G Willcutt; Sally J Wadsworth
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2010-03-01

4.  IQ Is Not Strongly Related to Response to Reading Instruction: A Meta-Analytic Interpretation.

Authors:  Karla K Stuebing; Amy E Barth; Peter J Molfese; Brandon Weiss; Jack M Fletcher
Journal:  Except Child       Date:  2009-10-01

5.  The contribution to immediate serial recall of rehearsal, search speed, access to lexical memory, and phonological coding: an investigation at the construct level.

Authors:  Gerald Tehan; Gerard Fogarty; Katherine Ryan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

6.  The Role of Brain Activity in Characterizing Successful Reading Intervention in Children With Dyslexia.

Authors:  Anthony J Krafnick; Eileen M Napoliello; D Lynn Flowers; Guinevere F Eden
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 5.152

7.  Are Child Cognitive Characteristics Strong Predictors of Responses to Intervention? A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Karla K Stuebing; Amy E Barth; Lisa H Trahan; Radhika R Reddy; Jeremy Miciak; Jack M Fletcher
Journal:  Rev Educ Res       Date:  2014-11-12

Review 8.  Annual research review: the nature and classification of reading disorders--a commentary on proposals for DSM-5.

Authors:  Margaret J Snowling; Charles Hulme
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 8.982

9.  The dimensionality of phonological awareness among Brazilian Portuguese-speaking children: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Cláudia Nascimento Guaraldo Justi; Flávia Guimarães Henriques; Francis Ricardo Dos Reis Justi
Journal:  Psicol Reflex Crit       Date:  2021-08-03

10.  EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity.

Authors:  Hugo Cogo-Moreira; George B Ploubidis; Clara Regina Brandão de Ávila; Jair de Jesus Mari; Angela Maria Vieira Pinheiro
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.570

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.