Literature DB >> 9926882

A randomized clinical trial of two surgical techniques for cesarean section.

M Franchi1, F Ghezzi, D Balestreri, P Beretta, E Maymon, M Miglierina, P F Bolis.   

Abstract

The Joel-Cohen incision followed by nonclosure of pelvic and parietal peritoneum has been advocated as an alternative method to the Pfannenstiel incision with peritonealization at cesarean section. A randomized trial was designed to compare intra- and postoperative morbidity between the two techniques. Women to undergo a cesarean section were randomly allocated to have either the Joel-Cohen incision with the parietal and pelvic peritoneum left open (group 1) or to have the Pfannenstiel incision with both peritoneal layers sutured (group 2). The myometrium was closed with 1-0 polyglactin 910 suture using a continuous single-layer nonlocking technique. Patients in group 2 had the peritoneum approximated with 2-0 polyglactin 910 suture. The fascia was sutured with continuous 1-0 polyglactin 910 suture in all cases. Opening time was defined as the interval from skin incision to the opening of the uterine cavity. Febrile morbidity was defined as a temperature > or =38 degrees C on two occasions 4 hours (hr) apart excluding the first postoperative day. Endometritis was defined as postpartum temperature > or =38 degrees C on two occasions 4 hr apart, with uterine tenderness and/or foul-smelling lochia. One hundred forty-nine and 150 patients were allocated to group 1 and to group 2, respectively. A shorter median (range) opening time [4 min (2-21) vs. 6 min (2-19), respectively, p < 0.01] and a shorter median (range) operative time [30 min (10-65) vs. 40 min (20-110), respectively, p < 0.01] were observed in group 1. No difference was found in terms of intraoperative complications, proportion of patients who required transfusion, endometritis, sepsis, febrile morbidity, and urinary tract infections. A higher rate of wound infections was found in group 2 than in group 1 [14 of 150 (9.3%) vs. 2 of 149 (1.3%), respectively, p < 0.01]. The Joel-Cohen incision without peritonealization resulted in a shorter opening and total operative time than the Pfannenstiel laparotomy with peritonealization. This was accomplished with a reduction of wound infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9926882     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-994066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  5 in total

1.  A randomized comparative study on modified Joel-Cohen incision versus Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean section.

Authors:  Shyama Prasad Saha; Nabendu Bhattarcharjee; Sabysachi Das Mahanta; Animesh Naskar; Sanjoy Kumar Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2013-03-01

2.  Caesarean deliveries by Pfannenstiel versus Joel-Cohen incision: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Wessam Magdy Abuelghar; Gasser El-Bishry; Lamiaa H Emam
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2013-12-01

Review 3.  Techniques for caesarean section.

Authors:  G J Hofmeyr; M Mathai; A Shah; N Novikova
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

Review 4.  Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Anthony A Bamigboye; G Justus Hofmeyr
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-08-11

5.  Effect of single- and double-layer cesarean section closure on residual myometrial thickness and isthmocele - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors:  Greg J Marchand; Ahmed Masoud; Alexa King; Stacy Ruther; Giovanna Brazil; Hollie Ulibarri; Julia Parise; Amanda Arroyo; Catherine Coriell; Sydnee Goetz; Ashley Christensen; Katelyn Sainz
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-12-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.