Literature DB >> 24592067

A randomized comparative study on modified Joel-Cohen incision versus Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean section.

Shyama Prasad Saha1, Nabendu Bhattarcharjee2, Sabysachi Das Mahanta2, Animesh Naskar2, Sanjoy Kumar Bhattacharyya1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pfanennstiel incision is the most commonly used incision for cesarean section, but may not be the best. This study compared the modified Joel-Cohen incision with the Pfannenstiel incision to evaluate whether techniques to open the abdomen might influence operative time, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a randomized comparative trial, 302 women with gestational age >34 weeks, requiring cesarean section, were randomly assigned to either modified Joel-Cohen incision or Pfannenstiel incision for entry into the peritoneal cavity. The primary outcome measure was total time required for performing operation and secondary outcome measures were baby extraction time, number of haemostatic procedures used in the abdominal wall, postoperative morbidity, postoperative hospital stay and neonatal outcome.
RESULTS: Mean total operative time was significantly less in the modified Joel-Cohen group as compared to the Pfannenstiel group (29.81 vs 32.67 min, p<0.0001, 95%CI=2.253 to 3.467). Time taken to deliver the baby and haemostatic procedures required during operation were also significantly less in the modified Joel-Cohen group as compared to the Pfannenstiel group. Requirement of strong analgesics was higher in the Pfannenstiel group (53.64% vs 21.85%, p<0.0001). There was no statically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative wound complications but postoperative stay in hospital was significantly less in the modified Joel-Cohen group (p=0.002). Neonatal outcomes were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSION: The modified Joel-Cohen incision for entry into peritoneal cavity during cesarean section is associated with reduced mean total operative and baby extraction times with less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay, which may be beneficial and cost effective.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section; Pfannenstiel; incision; modified Joel-Cohen; operative time

Year:  2013        PMID: 24592067      PMCID: PMC3881734          DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2013.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc        ISSN: 1309-0380


  10 in total

1.  [Cesarean section by the Misgav Ladach+ with the abdominal opening surgery by the Joel Cohen method].

Authors:  Z Zienkowicz; S Suchocki; H Sleboda; M Bojarski
Journal:  Ginekol Pol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description.

Authors:  G Holmgren; L Sjöholm; M Stark
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Long-term outcomes of two different surgical techniques for cesarean.

Authors:  A F Nabhan
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  Pelosi-type vs. traditional cesarean delivery. A prospective comparison.

Authors:  R M Wood; H Simon; A U Oz
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 0.142

5.  Can Joel-Cohen incision and single layer reconstruction reduce cesarean section morbidity?

Authors:  A G Ferrari; L G Frigerio; G Candotti; M Buscaglia; M Petrone; A Taglioretti; G Calori
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  Joel-Cohen or Pfannenstiel incision at cesarean delivery: does it make a difference?

Authors:  Massimo Franchi; Fabio Ghezzi; Luigi Raio; Edoardo Di Naro; Massimiliano Miglierina; Massimo Agosti; Pierfrancesco Bolis
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  A randomized clinical trial of two surgical techniques for cesarean section.

Authors:  M Franchi; F Ghezzi; D Balestreri; P Beretta; E Maymon; M Miglierina; P F Bolis
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section.

Authors:  Jodie M Dodd; Elizabeth R Anderson; Simon Gates
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16

9.  [Transverse trans-rectus abdominis incision in gynaecological and obstetrical surgery. 673 cases (author's transl)].

Authors:  J Mouchel
Journal:  Nouv Presse Med       Date:  1981-02-14

Review 10.  Techniques for caesarean section.

Authors:  G J Hofmeyr; M Mathai; A Shah; N Novikova
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23
  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of the Joel-Cohen-based technique and the transverse Pfannenstiel for caesarean section for safety and effectiveness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alireza Olyaeemanesh; Elahe Bavandpour; Mohammadreza Mobinizadeh; Mansoor Ashrafinia; Maryam Bavandpour; Mojtaba Nouhi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2017-09-04

2.  Machine Learning-Based Gynecologic Tumor Diagnosis and Its Postoperative Incisional Infection Influence Factor Analysis.

Authors:  Qian Shen; Ling Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.682

3.  The Case for Standardizing Cesarean Delivery Technique: Seeing the Forest for the Trees.

Authors:  Joshua D Dahlke; Hector Mendez-Figueroa; Lindsay Maggio; Jeffrey D Sperling; Suneet P Chauhan; Dwight J Rouse
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 7.623

4.  Reducing surgical site infections and mortality among obstetric surgical patients in Tanzania: a pre-evaluation and postevaluation of a multicomponent safe surgery intervention.

Authors:  Edwin Charles Ernest; Augustino Hellar; John Varallo; Leopold Tibyehabwa; Margaret Mary Bertram; Laura Fitzgerald; Adam Katoto; Stella Mshana; Dorcas Simba; Kelvin Gwitaba; Rohini Boddu; Shehnaz Alidina; Geofrey Giiti; Albert Kihunrwa; Belinda Balandya; David Urassa; Yahya Hussein; Caroline Damien; Brendan Wackenreuter; David Barash; Melissa Morrison; Cheri Reynolds; Alice Christensen; Ahmed Makuwani
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.