Literature DB >> 9926388

Dynamic motion analysis of normal and unstable cervical spines using cineradiography. An in vivo study.

H Hino1, K Abumi, M Kanayama, K Kaneda.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cervical motion patterns were analyzed in a normal population and in patients with cervical instability by using cineradiography.
OBJECTIVES: To determine normal and pathologic motion patterns in the cervical spine through an in vivo continuous motion analysis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cineradiographic techniques have been used in a limited number of studies to quantify spinal motion. There is a paucity of information regarding dynamic motion patterns in normal and pathologic cervical spines.
METHODS: Ten healthy subjects and 12 patients with unstable cervical spines (C1-C2 subluxation caused by rheumatoid arthritis, n = 10; instability below C2, n = 2) were studied. Cervical motion during flexion from the maximum extension position was recorded using cineradiography. Cervical segmental motions (C1-C2 to C5-C6) were continuously measured through quantifying cineradiographic images projected on a digitizer.
RESULTS: Normal cervical spines showed a well-regulated stepwise motion pattern that initiated at C1-C2 and transmitted to the lower segments with time lags. Pathologic spines showed a different order of onset of segmental motion. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had atlantoaxial subluxation, C1-C2 motion initiated significantly earlier than C2-C3 motion. In patients with segmental instability below C2, motion in the unstable segments preceded that in the upper intact segments.
CONCLUSIONS: Different motion patterns were observed between normal and pathologic cervical spines. Cineradiographic motion analysis is a valuable adjunctive technique, especially in diagnosis or evaluation of conditions that cannot be identified through conventional radiographic examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9926388     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199901150-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  13 in total

1.  Observer agreement in assessing flexion-extension X-rays of the cervical spine, with and without the use of quantitative measurements of intervertebral motion.

Authors:  Mehul Taylor; John A Hipp; Stanley D Gertzbein; Shankar Gopinath; Charles A Reitman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  The quantitative measurements of the intervertebral angulation and translation during cervical flexion and extension.

Authors:  Shyi-Kuen Wu; Li-Chieh Kuo; Haw-Chang H Lan; Sen-Wei Tsai; Chiung-Ling Chen; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Assessment of adjacent-segment mobility after cervical disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with 1 year's results.

Authors:  A Nabhan; B Ishak; W I Steudel; S Ramadhan; O Steimer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A 3D motion analysis study comparing the effectiveness of cervical spine orthoses at restricting spinal motion through physiological ranges.

Authors:  Nicholas Rhys Evans; Georgina Hooper; Rachel Edwards; Gemma Whatling; Valerie Sparkes; Cathy Holt; Sashin Ahuja
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Three-dimensional CT study on normal anatomical features of atlanto-axial joints.

Authors:  Shaoyin Duan; Feng Ye; Jianghe Kang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 6.  Cervical disc degeneration: important considerations for the manual therapist.

Authors:  Brian T Swanson; Douglas Creighton
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-11-25

7.  Continuous cervical spine kinematics during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Six-degrees-of-freedom cervical spine range of motion during dynamic flexion-extension after single-level anterior arthrodesis: comparison with asymptomatic control subjects.

Authors:  William J Anderst; Joon Y Lee; William F Donaldson; James D Kang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Evaluation of diagnosis techniques used for spinal injury related back pain.

Authors:  Meaghan Janssen; Aliaa Nabih; Walied Moussa; Gregory N Kawchuk; Jason P Carey
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2011-06-13

10.  Measurement of intervertebral motion using quantitative fluoroscopy: report of an international forum and proposal for use in the assessment of degenerative disc disease in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Alan C Breen; Deydre S Teyhen; Fiona E Mellor; Alexander C Breen; Kris W N Wong; Adam Deitz
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.