Literature DB >> 9925393

Correlation of lesion appearance and histologic findings for the nodes of a breast MR imaging interpretation model.

L W Nunes1, M D Schnall, S G Orel, M G Hochman, C P Langlotz, C A Reynolds, M H Torosian.   

Abstract

An interpretation model for evaluating magnetic resonance (MR) images of the breast was constructed that allowed differentiation of benign from malignant palpable or mammographically visible abnormalities. Architectural features define each node of the model. Investigation was subsequently made of the histologic findings in individuals within each node and of the frequency with which each histologic finding manifested as a particular architectural feature to determine whether nodal location and specific histologic findings are mutually predictive. The strongest associations were found between fibrocystic change and smooth masses, fibroadenoma and lobulated masses with nonenhancing internal septations, invasive ductal carcinoma (with or without ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]) and enhancing irregular or spiculated masses, invasive tubular carcinoma or radial scar and spiculated masses, medullary or colloid carcinoma and enhancing lobulated masses, invasive lobular carcinoma and the absence of a focal mass, DCIS and ductal enhancement, and DCIS (with or without invasive ductal carcinoma) and regional enhancement. Nodal location and histologic findings proved to be mutually predictive within the model; that is, the nodal location of MR imaging features within the model can be used to predict histologic findings and vice versa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9925393     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.19.1.g99ja0379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  8 in total

1.  A high spatial resolution 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging technique for breast cancer with a short echo time.

Authors:  Jiani Hu; Yingjian Yu; Zhifeng Kou; Wei Huang; Quan Jiang; Yang Xuan; Tao Li; Vivek Sehgal; Cassann Blake; E Mark Haacke; Renate L Soulen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  The Role of MR Mammography in Differentiating Benign from Malignant in Suspicious Breast Masses.

Authors:  Padhmini Balasubramanian; Vijaya Karthikeyan Murugesan; Vinoth Boopathy
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-09-01

Review 3.  Currently used non-specific extracellular MR contrast media.

Authors:  M F Bellin; M Vasile; S Morel-Precetti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Application of artificial neural networks to the analysis of dynamic MR imaging features of the breast.

Authors:  Botond K Szabó; Maria Kristoffersen Wiberg; Beata Boné; Peter Aspelin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Significance of breast lesion descriptors in the ACR BI-RADS MRI lexicon.

Authors:  Garima Agrawal; Min-Ying Su; Orhan Nalcioglu; Stephen A Feig; Jeon-Hor Chen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the breast at 3T: pre- and post-contrast evaluation for breast lesion characterization.

Authors:  E Kousi; I Tsougos; K Vasiou; K Theodorou; A Poultsidi; I Fezoulidis; C Kappas
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-03

7.  Should we use MRI to screen women at high-risk of breast cancer?

Authors:  F J Gilbert
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance in the detection of breast cancers of different histological types.

Authors:  Rebecca M Mayrhofer; Hsiao Piau Ng; Thomas C Putti; Philip W Kuchel
Journal:  Magn Reson Insights       Date:  2013-04-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.